VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

04 /25/ 24, 7:33amLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5678910 ]
Subject: Re: turbo vs no turbo


Author:
Bill
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 05/ 8/ 07, 6:41am
In reply to: Don Kukul 's message, "turbo vs no turbo" on 05/ 6/ 07, 6:28pm

I would always decide on condition, and repair/ maintenance information. OR keep looking.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> Subject: Re: turbo vs no turbo


Author:
Don
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 07/ 25/ 07, 2:37pm

Don,

By 1981 with the larger tanks the buses became quite heavy. The turbo 225hp or 250hp that the 1983 would have would be a nice plus for use and resale. At higher altitudes the turbo will readilly out pull the non-turbo 1982.

Regards, Don

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]



Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.