Friday, May 2, 2008 - New servers are in! Click-in for more info!
VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:26:03 03/30/06 Thu
Author: Dr Alastair Ruffell, Queen's University Belfast
Subject: Soil on Shoes?

I read Arthur and George with two intentions. First was to enjoy a good read, as we always do with Julian Barnes. The other was to see how the evidence we often cite in the Edalji case - of Doyle proving his innocence by the mud on his seized shows not matching that of the scene of the last animal mutilation (see Ruffell & McKinley, 2005, Earth Science Reviews, V 69, p235-247). The latter point, forgive me if I missed it, was not in Barne's book. Now I am seeking to test the veracity of this oft-quoted evidence (Murray 'Evidence from the Earth', Mountain Press, 2004). Can anyone help?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
 * Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
 * HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (required):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.