Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

04/20/24 6:15am PDT

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: USA vs. IRAQ Part II Author: democracy-4-all [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 04/ 5/03 2:38pm PST Puhleeze! I just want to make this clear! The USA didn't invade Iraq to control the world's second largest oil reserves in that country nor to assassinate its president, Saddam Hussein. The American forces are not there to sow terror neither, contrary to what some Muslims have been saying that Americans are just expanding their imperial authority through terroristic and bloody means. Never mind that George Bush's aggressive invasion of that Middle East Asian country is a violation of the United Nations' international laws. Truth be told, Attack on Iraq Part 2 was begun by the U.S. to liberate the Iraqis from Hussein's dictatorial government. Hence, US-Iraq War 2003 is also named by the military as Operation Iraqi Freedom. Watch CNN, will you? [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Wrong. The first reason given out by America why it attacked Iraq was to get rid of the latter's WMDs (weapons of mass destruction), which in the end turned out to be non-existent. (NT) must be the oil 04/11/03 4:29pm PDT You don't know that for sure. Just because there are no WMDs found yet in Iraq doesn't mean they don't exist. They already found chemical weapons and missile heads! (NT) -- Get real, 04/12/03 9:38am PDT Re: USA vs. IRAQ Part II Marsa de Riss 04/13/03 12:48pm PDT Take it easy! One at a time! North Korea is next! Also, the U.S. can't do it alone; she also the needs to support of her allies. Powerful nations have WMDs, but do they use them to kill their own people? I don't think so! (NT) -- Get real, 04/15/03 6:17pm PDT Re: USA vs. IRAQ Part II sunlion 05/12/03 3:41pm PDT Re: USA vs. IRAQ Part II Rolly 05/14/03 9:29pm PDT