VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:14:31 04/28/03 Mon
Author: Propane
Subject: Re: I beg to differ
In reply to: 's message, "Re: I beg to differ" on 23:04:23 04/27/03 Sun

Don't mind if I do

*ahem*

what?

>>Thus, in my view, you aren't referring to the fact
>>that equilateral implies isosceles, but, in fact, are
>>assuming that it does not.
>
>Speaking of which, how's that mind-reading helmet been
>treating you?
>
>The way I read the Admiral's post was that
>there are two kinds of isosceles triangles,
>classically isosceles, and technically isosceles (ie:
>equilateral). The conclusion of the proof was that
>triangle is equilateral, because space is quantal, and
>Triangle's properties are constrained by the medium.
>Therefore, he's only technically isosceles.
>But if you'd rather read it in such a way as to make
>it both self-contradictory and factually misinformed,
>feel free.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Re: I beg to differ -- Admiral Jota, 08:22:14 04/28/03 Mon
  • Re: I beg to differ -- No name, 16:16:58 07/11/03 Fri
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-5
    VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.