Date Posted:15:24:59 05/14/05 Sat Author: tv junkie mom...on her second box of tissues Subject: No, I'm here too. Wasnt it bad enough they were ending the show, did they really need to kill him off? In reply to:
PB
's message, "That's supposed to be why instead of we. I'm talking to myself here aren't I?" on 13:07:46 05/14/05 Sat
[> [> [> [>
I agree with you all. hat a way to end a good show. It was bad enough to keill off the baby, but why did they have to have T'Pol and Trip being estrange from each other. It defeated the whole purpose of the show -- talon, 13:29:35 05/15/05 Sun
Here they were forming a new federation of planets where Trip and T'Pol could have showcased the coming together of different people.
Why did Trip have to die to protect the idea of helping other people who were different.
Made more sense for it to be Malcolm or Travis.
Personally it should have been Archer that was killed off.
He was afterall the reason the show failed.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ] [Edit] [> [> [> [> [>
I agree Malcom or Travis would have been better choices. I like the actor playing Archer. But the character was pretty harsh in the last few seasons. -- PB,, 20:35:57 05/17/05 Tue
