Date Posted:13:29:35 05/15/05 Sun Author: talon Subject: I agree with you all. hat a way to end a good show. It was bad enough to keill off the baby, but why did they have to have T'Pol and Trip being estrange from each other. It defeated the whole purpose of the show In reply to:
tv junkie mom...on her second box of tissues
's message, "No, I'm here too. Wasnt it bad enough they were ending the show, did they really need to kill him off?" on 15:24:59 05/14/05 Sat
Here they were forming a new federation of planets where Trip and T'Pol could have showcased the coming together of different people.
Why did Trip have to die to protect the idea of helping other people who were different.
Made more sense for it to be Malcolm or Travis.
Personally it should have been Archer that was killed off.
[> [> [> [> [>
I agree Malcom or Travis would have been better choices. I like the actor playing Archer. But the character was pretty harsh in the last few seasons. -- PB,, 20:35:57 05/17/05 Tue
