Author: Roger L. Daigle via Duplicate Dawg [Edit]
|
Date Posted: 23:51 10/29/09 Thu
Response to the Pied Piper’s recent Valley Dispatch column:
“Protecting future of our Farms – Preserving agricultural roots”
Knowing full well that our Pied Piper has never been an advocate of fairness, the above headline that he describes, in my opinion, are at the very least, misnomers!!!
Before I proceed with my dissertation I want it understood that I’m not against farmers retaining their land, but I also want it understood that today (and for quite sometime now) they have to be considered “special interests”.
They (the agricultural family) have their lobbyist in D.C., Boston and Dracut (newly formed Agricultural Committee) to protect their interests and to fight for special privileges.
They, the farm owners, a number of years ago, petitioned our legislators and got passed what is now called Massachusetts General Law 61A. This, like most laws, is a very complex law, in that, only a very experienced assessor can deduce its many ramifications.
First, it has to be farm land! Simple, right?? No! It can be farmed for produce, for hay, a tree farm, it can be front land or back land. It can be a dairy farm and, I’m sure, they’ve formed many other categories. Each, however, has its own assessed valuation. For example, a farm that grows produce is assessed in the area of $795 per acre; if it grows hay, it’s in the area of $177 per acre; an apple farm, $760; unproductive land, as low as $29 an acre. To qualify for any category, there must be a minimum of five acres.
Compare any of the above to any individual owning less than five acres being assessed at near $150,000 an acre at Fair Market Value. If your piece of land is less than an acre, say 10,000 square feet, you’re taxed at near $40,000.
Our Pied Piper mentions the Burgess family land (trustee, the last time I checked, was a Ms. Pauline Hand). This family, at last check, owned land on Arlington Street, Methuen Street, and Kelley Road, totaling 142.67 acres. Having lost their barn and where it was considered a dairy farm, their assessed valuation, I’m sure will drop from dairy to hay and even maybe non-productive at which rate their total acreage of 143 will be assessed at almost half the assessed valuation of the guy owning five acres, assessed at the current Fair Market Value.
Now we know that owners of land presently assessed under M.G.L. 61A, if they were to decide to sell their land, have to offer it to the Town, first!! (To my knowledge, this has happened twice in the last 50 years.) Today however, the difficulty arises where the buyer (usually a developer) makes the owner an offer, substantially over the appraisal value, which then, the town can’t buy it due to restrictions of the Community Preservation Act law. Before the CPA law was passed, the town couldn’t afford the price.
In this Town, the owners have circumvented the “first offer” option by getting their money from the State’s APR (Agricultural Preservation Restrictions) fund, with our local Politicians prostituting the original intent of the CPA law by joining the State in paying CPA (our tax $ moneys) funds, totaling thousands of dollars, to owners who continue to OWN their land. All we and the State get for our tax money is the development rights!!???
All those years that the land was under 61A, the owners saved thousands of dollars on their taxes, at the expense of real estate owners and still sell their land for sometimes better than its Fair Market Value. For example, this same family, several years ago, sold another tract of land to a developer, for, as I remember it, $1,250,000. The Town, because of the vagaries of 61A, ended up with $12,000.
Is this what our Pied Piper means when he says “protecting the future of our farms”??? Shouldn’t he say, “Protecting the future of our farmers”!!! I’m, sure he wouldn’t be in favor of something that would be more fair and equitable to those other poor saps who have no lobbyists or representatives protecting their interests.
Lets keep reelecting those who favor over-representing the few at the expense of, we the dummies, who seem to love being taken for a walk off the pier!!! I’m sure he’ll continue to do everything in his power to protect his interests on New Boston Road and Marsh Hill Road (where his knowledge of the system saved him several hundred thousand dollars)
The Town seems to be inundated with citizens (???) who don’t seem to have the capacity to understand the difference between right and wrong, or good and bad!!?? To that coward who posted on “BackTalk” in the Lowell Sun’s 10/22/09 edition, that any elderly housing shouldn’t be built across the street from a playground. Another advocate of 1476 Mammoth Road, I’m sure, who can’t reason for himself/herself and make their own analyses – another puppet.
God bless America (he gave us all a free will, hopefully to do right for all people, not just special interests).
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
|