VoyForums

Saturday, November 21 2009, 3:09 pmVoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678[9]10 ]


Dracut After Dark
The Best Issues & Information Forum in Dracut

Entering Dracut sign

Untitled Document

Bon jour. Dracut After Dark is a moderated forum (a sounding board or bulletin board) which gives people the opportunity to express their views, ideas, questions, or concerns relative to Dracut Massachusetts and its surrounding area -- a local networking watchdog advocate or blog, if you will.

Any comments which are deemed: vulgar, inappropriate, libelous, slanderous, or in bad taste WILL NOT be posted here. Changing the subject on an already established string is strictly prohibited. Postings which contain specific addresses to other Dracut Internet message boards will also be rejected. Another thing we don't allow here are posts containing specific names and/or street addresses of private citizens, i.e. neighbor disputes. Furthermore, those who guess at pseudonyms will have their postings rejected, as well.

Opinions expressed on Dracut After Dark solely reflect those of the participants, and are not necessarily shared by the management of this message board. Participants post and read messages here on their own Free Will thanks to the First Amendment. We merely discuss issues here – we DO NOT profess to initiate, or even resolve, anything on this message board. If this Internet forum is not to your liking, then please, by all means, feel free to do your websurfing elsewhere.

Google (or any other Internet search engine) keywords:

Dracut After Dark

Please click only those search engine entries specifically stating,

www.voy.com/54926/

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Public Service Announcement

NEW MILLENNIUM SEPERATED/DIVORCED SUPPORT GROUP: Meets every Sunday from 7-9 p.m., at St. Michael’s School, 15 Sixth Street, off Bridge Street (Route 38) in Lowell. New subject matter is addressed every meeting dealing with topics such as: anger, loneliness, surviving Divorce, lawyers, Judges and our Court system, Alimony, Child Support, Child Custody, Visitation Rights, asset/property entitlements, children, finances, forgiveness, acceptance, faith and prayer, moving on, and, planning for your new life. This is a non-profit support group. No fees are required. For further information, please either attend this Sunday’s meeting, or contact Carlos Kilberg @ 978-957-2063 (cck3353@MSN.com).

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Get More Quotations


Dracut After Dark

Subject: Skateboard Park, & appointment of Mark Shaw to Agricultural Committee could haunt DiRocco in reelection bid


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:56 12/28/08 Sun

(published in, Lowell Sun, The Column, 12-28-08)

WITH THE new year come thoughts of nomination papers for the upcoming spring elections. Dracut Selectman Joe DiRocco has the benefit of being the lone member of his board on the ballot this year, meaning that anyone with thoughts of running against him has less chance than in other years, when two members of the board come up for re-election.

"It becomes more personal if you're challenging a lone incumbent," said one political observer last week. "When you're running against two people, you can always say, 'I'm just running for one of the seats.' Running against a single incumbent means you have to come up with a host of reasons to vote for you and against that other person."

Some of the early names circulating around town include Planning Board member Brian Bond, one of the driving forces behind the Canney Farm project, and Ted Kosiavelon, who ran an unsuccessful challenge against Selectmen Robert Cox and John Zimini last year.

Two people are up for re-election on the Dracut School Committee. Chairman Ron Mercier Jr. and Nancy Gagnon are both running for their third term. No challengers have yet emerged.
Replies:
Subject: Deval Patrick Speaks To Massachusetts Municipal Association


Author:
Announces Cuts and Tax Increases
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:46 01/24/09 Sat


Calls for Cities, Towns and state Legislature to Take Action and reform.

http://www.blinkx.com/video/patrick-seeks-128-million-cut-in-local-aid/pzMHCSotf65WNY5_PTuZ3g

http://www.blinkx.com/videos/Municipal+Association

http://www.necn.com/Boston/Business/2009/01/23/Patrick-Tough-choices-among/1232735345.html
Replies:
Subject: absolutely pathetic.


Author:
ahahaha
[Edit]

Date Posted: 02:50 01/27/09 Tue

This is a website where old farts who live in this town who do nothing but complain and talk about everything that's wrong with it. If you want change, get your a$$ up and do it yourself. Think about this, at one point you've told your children how bad it is to make fun of people and that it's the wrong thing to do, but sitting at your computer bashing anonymously about the people who run our town and its organizations is acceptable? You're all unbelievable.
Replies:
Subject: SCORES OF PEOPLE IN TOWN ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT HOW THE TOWN BURRIED THERE DRIVEWAYS A FEW DAYS AGO AND IT ALL TURNED TO ICE THANKS TO THE TOWN.


Author:
SHOVELING
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:24 01/10/09 Sat

Replies:
Subject: WHY DO WE NEED TWO BUILDING INSPECTORS WHEN THERE IS NO NEED FOR TWO?


Author:
DAFFY
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:45 01/10/09 Sat

The economy has slowed to a crawl.Why should we pay for two building inspectors when we only need one.The building boom is gone for many years to come.People just do not have the money to spend unless its absolutley needed.Look around Dracut there is hardly any construction going on.I hope people take a good look at this issue.We could be saving money for the town.
Replies:
Subject: Public Sector Soon to Feel Effects Of Recession;


Author:
Private Sector Has Been Enduring for A Year!
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:30 01/19/09 Mon

Private companies and small businesses have been scaling back with layoffs, cuts in benefits, wage rate freezes and putting off expenditures for more than a year.This has had a serious impact on everyone including us in Dracut. Shortages in short term lending has put many small businesses on verge of bankruptcy. Drop in stock market means there were very few capital gains.

Folks have endured a year with extreme inflation with big increases in every day necesssities. A Scaling back on travel, food choices, new clothing and entertainment including playing the lottery has been made to make ends meet. New home sales have disappeared and home improvement projects are put on hold indefinitly .

As expected, State Tax revenues are DOWN; No surprise here.

Fewer Working or Working for Less Pay - Means Less Tax Revenue

Fewer Purchases - Means Less Sales Tax Revenue

Less travel - Means Less Hotel/Motel Tax Revenues

Less eating out - Means Less meals tax revenues

Stock Market in the Tank - Means NO Capital Gains Tax Revenues

Driving less or using gas effient cars - Means Less Gas Tax Revenue and fewer toll collections

Little Home Building and Improvements - Means Less permit fees collected

Less Lottery Playing - Reduced Revenue to Cities And Towns.

State and Local Officials have Waited Hoping the recession would end before any real budget work would have to occur. Well get ready to roll up your sleeves like the rest of us.

Cuts in LOCAL AID could be 3 to 10 percent of what the State Gives Dracut ($32,000,000) or cuts in the $1,0000,000 to $3,200,000 range. Dracut only has about $2,000,000 in rainy day funds and all might not be available. Not filling unfilled positions and cutting back on expenditures just will not get you all the way there. Deval Patrick has been given authority to make cuts to local aid and local municipalities including Dracut have been kept in The Dark ( I guess Figuratively and Literally in December)as to the extent of the Cuts. The extent will decide if tapping into rainy day fund or more severe cuts need to be made.

Add that the Teachers have Been Voted a 5 Percent Raise ($500,000 Budget Increase)and the Town is under a court order consent Decree to move forward to Make the Town Hall Handicap Accessible or find other space at a tune of at least $5 Million. (A Court Order Consent Decree is the Mechanism that resulted in the creation of MWRA and the Multi-Billion Dollar Boston HArbor Cleanup). If the Town Does Not act the Court will Take over and make the Decision for Dracut; Not a position Dracut wants to be put in given the track record of consent decrees. Long Put Off Improvements to High School may be requirement to maintain Acredidation; Insert Muli Multi-Million Dollar Number Here too.

The Town Manager, Department heads and others will have their real challenge over these next few months into the next couple of years and will understand the decisions private sector employees and small business owners have been making over this last year. Some hard decisions to be made.

We'll hear of Closing Library and a fire station, raising bus and sports fees. Cost of Recreation fields to go up or be bourne by users. Things that lessen service and increase cost Will BE Unacceptable. FOLKS HAVE NO MORE TO GIVE!! We have scaled Back to the bone marrow. Plus these moves will still not Be enough to close budget gap.

Some real reorganization choices will need to happen. Stimulus Hopes and activities will not be enough in time to finish this fiscal year. Do we have the talent???
Replies:
Subject: Look!


Author:
Look!
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:15 01/23/09 Fri

Sex offender found in truck with teenager

By James A. Kimble
jkimble@eagletribune.com

SALEM — A registered sex offender was found with a 15-year-old Methuen, Mass., boy in a store parking lot at 2:48 a.m. yesterday, prompting an investigation in Massachusetts into child solicitation.

A Salem officer found Rodney A. Martineau, 42, of 61 Monadnock Ave. in Dracut, Mass., sitting in a Dodge pickup truck with the teen in Eastpointe Plaza.

Martineau and the boy were fully clothed and repeatedly denied anything physical happened between them.

Martineau's status as a registered sex offender and the unusual circumstances in which he was found weren't enough to warrant felony charges in New Hampshire. But Salem police say he could face a such charges in Massachusetts.

They have forwarded their findings to Methuen police, who have started their own investigation.

Martineau was arrested for interference with custody and loitering yesterday morning after police interviewed the boy and checked Martineau's background.

"Based on what we learned from the juvenile and his parents, we believe there was an active solicitation attempt on this child," Salem police Capt. Shawn Patten said. "All of it occurred in Methuen, but we have brought all the charges we could in our jurisdiction."

Methuen police Capt. Thomas Fram confirmed yesterday detectives are now looking into the matter.

Martineau served 27 months in federal prison for possession of child pornography. Authorities found him with a pornographic videotape in July 2001, according to a federal indictment.

He pleaded guilty to the offense and his probation expired in 2007, after 36 months.

But court documents indicate Martineau spent months resisting demands from federal probation officials that he undergo regular polygraph testing to ensure he was being truthful with them.

They were specifically worried whether Martineau would comply with the court's special conditions "related to refraining from child pornography on the Internet and having no unsupervised contact with children under the age of 18 years," court documents say.

A concerned resident called police early yesterday about a vehicle parked behind Eastpointe Plaza at 130 Main St.

Salem police Officer Michael White found Martineau and the boy sitting inside a 2002 white Dodge Ram pickup truck with the engine running.

White ran a background check on Martineau and learned he was a registered sex offender in Massachusetts, according to a police affidavit. The officer then asked the boy to step out of the car and took him into protective custody after questioning him.

The boy admitted to police he snuck out of his Methuen home around 1 a.m. to meet Martineau. Martineau and the youth had been communicating through an instant messenger program for the last few weeks. They initially met where the boy works, police said. Martineau was a customer.

Martineau told the boy to lie about why he was with him, according to White.

Patten said the boy was surprised to find out how old Martineau was. Martineau allegedly told the teen he was 27, not 42.

White took the boy into custody so he could notify his parents. Martineau reported to police headquarters hours later to be charged with the misdemeanor and violation-level offenses, and was released on bail.

Patten credited the quick police response for preventing something more egregious from happening.

"It was very good work by the officers on the midnight shift," Patten said. "The officer knew something was up. They knew it didn't look good and something wasn't right."

The boy told police he got worried while driving around with Martineau.

"He started to become nervous and began to make sure to take notice of street signs and where he was in case something happened," White wrote in his report.

Yesterday, it remained unclear whether Martineau ever completed his court-ordered sex offender treatment. He had contested participating in group therapy and taking polygraph exams.

His lawyer at the time, John Swomley, wrote in court papers the polygraph exams violated his client's right against self-incrimination and privacy. In 2005, Martineau dropped out of group therapy chosen by probation officials and went to a private psychologist instead.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Feeley responded by arguing the choice wasn't Martinueau's.

"Martineau is no more entitled to select his own treatment regimen than he is entitled to judge his own risk to third parties," Feeley wrote.
Subject: Thank God the Wilmington School Committee did NOT follow Dracut's example


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:16 01/23/09 Fri

(published in, Lowell Sun, editorial, 1-23-09)

Hold the line

For decades, school committees have typically bowed to the pressure of teachers' unions by handing out good pay increases along with more-than-generous benefits.

When the economy was humming along nicely, no one thought too much about it. After all, there was plenty of money coming in and most taxpayers were able to pay their monthly bills with little difficulty.

My, how times have changed.

In today's world, Americans are losing their jobs, their homes, their ability to provide for their families. Times are tough and are expected to get a lot tougher.

With that in mind, we commend the Wilmington School Committee for rejecting a tentative agreement with the teachers' union, a deal that certainly would have cost the town a good chunk of change and may well have necessitated more layoffs than may now be required.

The details of the tentative deal haven't been disclosed, but Wilmington Teachers Association President Joseph Kleponis said it was similar to an agreement recently finalized with Dracut teachers. That contract included an 8 percent raise over three years.

Given the recent announcements by Gov. Deval Patrick that the state will be reducing local aid to communities, the Wilmington School Committee made the right decision to reopen negotiations. Isn't it better to give no raises than to have to lay off teachers?

Recently, we criticized the school committee for not being open with the teachers' union and the public. We stand by
our concern on that issue. It shouldn't have taken 46 days for the board to come forward with their financial worries.

But we applaud the committee for taking a tough stand on the proposed contract. It's not easy to tell employees that pay raises just aren't in the fiscal forecast, but officials are elected, and expected, to make tough decisions in difficult times.

The committee must balance protecting the integrity of the schools and the education students receive with the reality of the public treasury. Perhaps this is the first step in cracking the entitlement mentality that exists in far too many unions.

Nationwide, people are facing wage freezes, job losses and benefits losses. Those toiling in the private sector, who are coping with these privations, can't be expected to continue funding salary and benefits increases for public-sector union members.

It's time to for public officials to take a stand.
Subject: Fire Hydrants


Author:
Drive through Dracut
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:11 01/13/09 Tue

What an Excellent the Fire Dept has done on all the fire hydrants in Dracut. I pass through on my way to work and all are clear and flags put on each one. Hats off to them!
Replies:
Subject: Why aren't the police getting all these cars off the road there is a winter ban on isn't there?


Author:
Vehicles
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:44 01/16/09 Fri

Replies:
Subject: Rally Cap bar was robbed just after noon earlier today


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 19:02 01/19/09 Mon

(published in, Lowell Sun, 1-19-09)

Dracut bar robbed shortly after noon Monday

By Jack Minch
jminch@lowellsun.com

DRACUT
-- Two men robbed the Rally Cap bar at 95 Pleasant St. Monday about 12:10 p.m.

The bartender sought refuge in a bathroom, police said in initial reports.

The men apparently did not show the bartender a weapon.

They were wearing sunglasses but no other descriptions were available.

For more on this story read Tuesday's Sun or click on http://www.lowellsun.com
Replies:
Subject: female firefighter


Author:
concerned citizen
[Edit]

Date Posted: 14:28 01/18/09 Sun

What is up with the woman who cried discrinmination when she didn't get the firefighter job? Couldn't take the test becasue of some medical thing. She whined she was a capable as any guy and could do the work if she was given the chance to take the test after she recovered. Fought and finally got her job. Now I hear she worked a few months and has not worked in something like 2 years. But she is still getting paid. What is up with this??? I guess the chief was right the first time when he passed her over.
Replies:
Subject: AFTER BAILOUT, GET OUT


Author:
Dick Morris
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:48 01/15/09 Thu

With both President Bush and President-elect Obama pressing the new Congress to appropriate the remaining $350 billion in authorized bailout funds, the Congress has a historic opportunity to demonstrate its preference for the free enterprise system over socialism. Congress should give Obama these funds, weapons in the war against the depression, but ought to attach an amendment prohibiting the federal government from using the leverage the funds give it -- and any equity it may acquire in these companies as a result of these funds -- to influence corporate lending, hiring, management or other practices.

The federal fire department has come to the rescue of these burning companies in the midst of their economic conflagration. The question now is whether the firefighters will go home. Or will they stay on to live in the house they have just saved from the flames, even evicting the homeowners? Will the feds now say, in effect, "We saved you, now we own you"?

The crucial difference between the approach favored by House Republicans and former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and the bailout that was passed in October of last year was that the Republicans contemplated using insurance and loans, not outright grants, to shore up endangered companies. One key reason for their resistance to giving away grants was the realization that the Democrats would demand that the "taxpayers get something back" for all the capital they were giving banks. Inevitably, they realized, federal aid would come with a demand for government-owned stock in the companies receiving the assistance.

Now that the feds have become stockholders in our major banks and insurance companies, the question is: What will they do with this power?

Hanging in the balance will be whether the United States continues to follow free-market economics or chooses to emulate the no-growth, government-dominated economies that prevail in Western Europe.

Will we cash in our capitalist system for a socialist democracy?

It is easy to see how socialism could start. Federal regulators might demand, with some justice, that banks limit their compensation and bonus packages to senior executives, just as they have already made manifest their displeasure at AIG's party-loving, frat-jock ways. From there, the feds could go to imposing affirmative action goals on hiring and promotion, government guidance on lending decisions, proscriptions on redlining and the like.

It is great that Citibank has agreed to work in bankruptcy courts with defaulting lenders to restructure and reduce loan payments and even to cut interest rates or forgive principal. But it is dangerous that Citi's enlightenment came not from inner virtue but from pressure by its federal government benefactors.

Even if we do not evolve into a European-style government with permanent ownership positions in key banks and insurance companies and a public sector that is not shy about issuing orders, we could go the way of Japan very easily. Tokyo needs no such formal power; a word to the wise whispered into a banker's ear by a MITI bureaucrat can achieve sudden changes in bank policy. The result of this public power over private companies has been a kind of crony capitalism that has brought economic growth to a standstill in Japan as it has in Europe. Too often the public regulators guess wrong, as when Japan told its industry to focus on mainframe computers rather than laptops.

And there is always a Blagojevich somewhere, scheming to get rich by demanding kickbacks from publicly subsidized banks and insurance companies. Political cronyism and corruption seeps into private business decisions when the door is opened by taxpayer subsidies and government stock holdings.

The solution is clear. President-elect Obama wants the $350 billion to be at his beck and call when he takes office. He's right to want it. But Congress should attach an amendment limiting the role the federal government can play in the ownership, management, policies and operations of the companies to which it pays this bailout money. We want bailouts, not a government takeover in disguise.
Replies:
Subject: Missing Greyhound


Author:
Pugmama
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:19 12/19/08 Fri

The dog's owner had the dog in her backyard with her other dog. She thinks the greyhound may have seen something like a squirrel in the woods behind her house and took off after it. The dog was on the owner's property when she took off. Once she was off the property it was a violation of the leash law which is a warning for the first offense. Considering the heartbreak the owner and her family have gone through losing their pet, it hardly accomplishes anything by telling them they violated the leash law. There are many irresponsible dog owners in town that blatantly violate the leash law on a regular basis - Dash's owner is not one of them. This incident was just a tragic mishap.

I wish I had nothing else to worry about than the flyers on telephone poles in Dracut - must be nice.
Replies:
Subject: Patrick deflects questions on local aid reductions


Author:
The Boston Globe
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:37 01/15/09 Thu

By Matt Viser
Globe Staff / January 15, 2009

Governor Deval Patrick warned yesterday that the next round of state budget cuts will be severe, but he deflected calls from Republican lawmakers to publicly explain how deeply he plans to cut state aid to cities and towns.

"We're looking to apportion the pain - and it's sure to be painful - as equitably as possible and as broadly as possible," Patrick said while he walked to his State House office yesterday afternoon as the Legislature was voting to give him broad powers to cut spending.

"There are a bunch of different scenarios that we have been working through," said Patrick, who plans to deliver a sober message tonight in his televised State of the State address.

The House voted 131 to 22 last night to give Patrick wide latitude in slashing the state budget, a move that is expected to trigger cuts throughout state government and a major reduction in the $5.3 billion the state distributes to cities and towns. The Senate followed suit about an hour later, voting 32-6. Voting in both chambers was largely along party lines, with only a handful of Democrats voting against giving the governor the expanded power.

Patrick now must use a variety of formulas to figure out how to cut the state funding to cities and towns, and some lawmakers were speculating he would cut up to $500 million. One consideration is whether he will make an effort to cut funds more heavily for wealthy communities to preserve funding for poorer areas that need state funding to combat higher crime rates, struggling school systems, and rising property taxes.

Lawmakers and budget specialists are also waiting to see if he will tap any of the $1.7 billion remaining in the state's reserve account and whether to push for increasing fees or taxes. Money from a federal stimulus package could also help alleviate some of the budget cuts.

Administration officials said this week that a drop in revenues has left a $1.1 billion budget gap. Patrick has two weeks to announce a plan to close the gap, using last night's approval of so-called 9C powers. But local officials are hoping he won't use the full two weeks before announcing his intentions. Cuts to local budgets - which fund teacher salaries, trash pickups, and other services - are particularly painful in the middle of the year, once spending has already been set.

"Until a month ago, most of us were praying we weren't going to have to do this," said Mayor Thomas G. Ambrosino of Revere, where state aid makes up more than a third of the city's $130 million budget. "Now that it's inevitable, we're saying, 'Give us a number.' The longer we wait, the more painful it's going to be to cut."

When Governor Mitt Romney cut state aid earlier in this decade, the state's poorest cities and towns bore the brunt of the cuts, largely because he reduced $73 million from lottery aid, which flows disproportionately to poorer cities such as New Bedford, Fall River, and Lynn. He also cut $42 million from so-called additional assistance, which goes to 159 cities and towns in mostly urban areas where extra money is needed. Romney did not cut Chapter 70, the main source of education money.

"Local aid cuts are going to be painful, no matter how they're done," said Geoff Beckwith, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association.

The Legislature attached conditions to Patrick's midyear budget-cutting power. Lawmakers exempted the legislative and judicial branches from Patrick's budget pen, for example, and stipulated that only one-third of the governor's cuts for this fiscal year can be applied to local aid. House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi has estimated that the total cuts would be $1.7 billion, meaning up to $560 million would be cut from local aid.

"Support for local aid is an issue which is the top priority, I would dare say, for every person in this chamber," said Robert A. DeLeo, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. "We have difficult decisions. We have pain, but we have to make sure the pain is distributed equally across the Commonwealth."

Republican lawmakers blasted Patrick for not being more forthcoming about his imminent budget cuts, and they fought for hours against legislation to give the governor unilateral budget-cutting powers.

"He hasn't provided any information to anyone," Senate minority leader Richard R. Tisei said in an interview. "It's disgraceful, and he's not living up to the job."
Subject: Dracut police officials now confirm lie-detectors are being used in '02 stolen drug incident


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:49 01/04/09 Sun

(published in, Lowell Sun, The Column, 1-4-09)

Years later, police still abuzz over drug probe

Sun Staff Report

THE INVESTIGATION
into the missing drugs from a Dracut Police Department storage shed in 2002 is heating up, and so are officers' emotions.

Deputy Chief David Chartrand last week confirmed that lie-detector tests were being administered by the Northeast Middlesex Law Enforcement Council, which is conducting the investigation. He would not elaborate or say if every member of the force is being asked to submit to the polygraph exam.

In coffee shops and on street corners, several members of the department are talking. Many of them are not happy.

"How do you do this in good conscience?" said one officer on the condition of anonymity. "There were people on the force at the time who have passed away. There are people on the force now who weren't here when it happened. How do you conduct an investigation?"

Others are welcoming the investigation.

"I'm happy about it," said a department veteran. "We want to get rid of the people in this department who have no integrity. Look around. Look who is running scared. That should tell you something."

It was in 2002 when a large quantity of marijuana -- which was stored as evidence in a criminal case -- went missing from a storage shed behind the old Dracut Police Department on Lakeview Avenue.

Chartrand was the shed-master at the time, a fact that has Jerry Flynn, executive director of the New England Police Benevolent Association, scratching his head.

"They can put any kind of spin on it that they want, but the bottom line is that this investigation is being promulgated by the person who was in charge at the time," Flynn said. "They were storing evidence in a shed behind the station next to the high school. It was protected by a bicycle lock and every kid in that school knew what was in there. And now they're going to trample on the good names of dedicated and hard-working police officers in their department, instead of going after the guy who was actually in charge. It makes no sense."

Tony Archinski, a former lieutenant who retired Dec. 31, agrees with Flynn. Archinski now works with Flynn at NEPBA.

"This has been a management screw-up from day one and not one member of the administration has ever been held accountable for their actions," Archinski said. "Instead, they're pointing fingers at everyone else in the department. Even if they discover that somebody is lying, what are they going to do, fire them? Based on a polygraph, which is inadmissible in any court of law? The Civil Service would never uphold that."


Chartrand says he voluntarily took a polygraph test administered by the state police shortly after the incident, and passed. He dismisses Flynn's comments: "It's the classic union mentality to circle the wagons when it comes to any kind of investigation regarding one of their own. They will try to turn the focus on somebody else, anybody else. They think intimidation is going to work. They're barking up the wrong tree."
Replies:
Subject: It’d be a crying shame if most of these races go uncontested in ‘09 Town Election


Author:
Nostradamus
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:51 01/01/09 Thu

I could probably write a novel on the majority of these incumbents vying for reelection this May, but I’ll hold off and wait to see if they’ll have any challengers opposing them. If not, why bother?

Office — Term in Years — Incumbent

Town Moderator — 1 year — Gary W. McCarthy

Library Trustee — 3 years — Mary Lee Matthews
“ ” “ ” — “ ” — John Dyer

Greater-Lowell Technical (Voke) School Committee — 3 years — Dennis “D.J.” Deeb

Dracut Housing Authority Commissioner — 5 years — Robert Audet

School Committee — 3 years — Ronald Mercier
“ ” “ “ — “ ” — Nancy Gagnon

Selectman — 3 years — Joseph DiRocco

Water Commissioner — 3 years — William “Zee” Zielinski

Water Moderator — 3 years — Donna Yackel

In addition to the aforementioned, elected seats may become available on both the Voke School Committee, and the Dracut School Committee if Brian and Mary Gail Martin sell their Collinsville home within the next couple of months, move out of town, and are then forced to resign from their elected positions.

You may want to contact the Town Clerk’s office or check the Official Town Website to find out when nomination papers become available but historically, the campaign season usually starts about the beginning of February with the return of nomination papers which require the proper number of bonafide signatures from registered voters due back at the Town Clerk’s office around the middle of March.

Reverting back to the past might be best strategy for visibility

For those who regularly log onto and read, Dracut After Dark, do you remember these two blurbs from a couple months ago?

Local blogger proves Lowell Sun’s circulation “DROPPED” nine (9%) percent in about a year

Pathetic, lackluster WCAP lost 83% of its audience since new ownership took over last year

Now, why would anybody, in their right mind, want to spend valuable campaign money on two sewer holes like the Lowell Sun or WCAP? To kiss Warren Shaw’s fat ass? To ASS-U-ME you’re automatically going to get an editorial endorsement from the Lowell Sun a couple days before the election? Unless you happen to be an incumbent running for reelection, The Sun most likely will NOT be endorsing your campaign no matter how much you spend on advertising in their newspaper. See, the Lowell Sun loves to jump on the proverbial bandwagon and then ride that sucker to the bitter end.

But isn’t visibility all about “getting your name noticed in the public eye”? If you agree, wouldn’t political signs and bumper stickers prompt more people in town to actually notice that you’re running for public elected office than blowing your money on a couple of losing propositions like The Sun, and ‘CAP? I mean if you’ve got about $10,000 to blow, why not go down to either Foxwoods or Mohegan Sun and have some real fun losing your shirt.

I thought it was absolutely hysterical when the Lowell Sun wrote an editorial criticizing Jim Ogonowski for not purchasing a $1,000-plus ad “thanking” all his supporters for voting for him in his unsuccessful Congressional run against Niki Tsongas. Aside from the obvious fact that The Sun publicly endorsed Tsongas in that particular race, the Lowell rag is losing a ton of money every day on lost subscriptions and lost advertising. Why would anybody waste their money advertising in the Lowell Sun if hardly anybody’s reading it these days?

Another thing which may already be obsolete in local election campaigns is candidates’ debates. If you don’t believe me, just ask Matt Sheehan how that works. You got a guy who moved here from Lowell a couple years ago, never really was active in community or charitable events, runs for Dracut School Committee and just blows off the annual Candidates’ Night by just saying he had a family issue that night – and he actually winds up winning!!! Go figure on that one. Ya gotta wonder what Dracut voters knew about Sheehan – if anything at all -- before they actually voted for him, but it still begs the question, Why bother having an annual Candidates’ Night and then broadcasting it numerous times on local access TV, if nobody is watching it? Secondly, since Mr. Sheehan is such a “family guy” as he boldly proclaimed after missing the only candidates’ debate of the campaign, did he proceed to enroll on the Town employees’ health insurance coverage as was rumored he’d do after he got elected?

Putting this site on the line for approved “BINDING” ballot question

I was willing to do it for just an appearance on Warren Shaw’s radio show, but maybe if I sweeten the pot a little bit, I might get a wee bit more of a reaction to it.

If the following item goes in VERBATIM (word for word) as a published referendum ballot question for the ‘09 Town Election, and then gets approved by a majority of Dracut voters (with AT LEAST a 30 percent of registered Dracut voter turnout) on May 4th – for stipend elected officials to continue enrolling and exploiting Town insurance coverage(s) – I will promptly dissolve and terminate, Dracut After Dark, Voy.com/54926/ , sometime on Tuesday, May 5th. The EXACT WORDING to this particular ballot referendum question has to be as follows:

Should local stipend elected officials -- specifically Board of Selectmen members, School Committee members, and Town Moderator – be allowed to enroll and exploit Dracut town employees’ insurance (health, life, dental, vision, etc.) coverage(s) under the options granted in Massachusetts General Law 32b? This referendum ballot question includes, but is not limited to, an individual who may have initially enrolled for their Town insurance coverage under M.G.L. 32b, and is now considered either “retired” from elected public office, or a “surviving spouse” to someone who may have died while serving in elected public office. Furthermore, since this is a “BINDING” referendum ballot question, a “NO” vote would terminate any and all of the aforementioned relevant individuals from continuing their enrollment on any of the Town’s insurance coverage(s) immediately after this Town Election is completed.

If the majority of Dracut voters would actually support and vote “YES” to a bullBLEEP “BINDING” referendum ballot question like this, then it’s definitely time for Yours Truly to just shake off the dust and move on. Come to think of it, if the majority of Dracut voters support this referendum ballot question, Roger L. Daigle would either need a new issue to complain about, OR, simply pull the plug on, “Inside Dracut Politics”.

I would definitely insist on having AT LEAST a 30 percent registered voter turnout participating in the ‘09 Town Election on a proposal like this because I know for a fact that all the dreaded PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES will be well-represented at these polls to personally take care of their OWN SPECIAL INTERESTS. For this same reason, I would never even entertain the notion of putting something this intense in the form of a warrant article and bringing it before an annual Town Meeting. Aside from the fact that it usually can barely even make a quorum with the minimum required amount of registered voters to officially hold one of these meetings, the vast majority of people in attendance are PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES, it’s no big secret that Town Moderator Gary McCarthy and Warren Shaw are “bosom buddies” with each other, those who attempt to voice a concern at the microphone contrary to the majority’s opinion on any issue are usually publicly “ridiculed” and “heckled” with no help whatsoever from the Moderator, and, although it states in the Town Meeting bylaws that at least 10 people in the audience can request a “secret ballot vote” – the Moderator usually never honors this rule.

For the aforementioned reasons, I feel a heck of a lot more comfortable bringing this before the Town via a referendum ballot question with AT LEAST a 30 percent voter turnout on Election Day, than I would as a warrant article at an annual Town Meeting.

Since School Committee member Ron Mercier, who’s up for reelection this year, is currently one of the stipend elected officials in town exploiting this particular perk, he could probably serve as the “unofficial spokesperson” for this ballot referendum question assuming it gets approved and is published on the ballot this year. Although I would assume Mercier would just yield any comments to this subject to his next door (or former next door neighbor?), New Boston Road neighbor, Warren Shaw. Better yet, Selectman and Attorney George Malliaros, a.k.a. The Golden Greek, also exploits the Town’s health insurance under M.G.L. 32b, and he might be the most eloquent spokesperson out of that bunch to continue bilking the Town of Dracut for this particular perk.

”Good people” just don’t run for elected public office anymore

As Mr. Shaw indicated in one of his recent Dispatch columns, their whole argument is based on, if the Town of Dracut ever eliminated these “free” insurance enrollments to stipend elected officials, there wouldn’t be any “good people” running for public office anymore, it would only be limited to stupid people and crooks. Keep in mind here, Warren admitted that he first got the idea to enroll on the Dracut town employees’ health insurance coverage from convicted felon and former Town Treasurer, Jim Doukszewicz, and now, seven-plus years afterwards, Mr. Shaw decided to finally “go public” and write a column about this questionable ordeal in the Dispatch. But whatever happened to “voluntary community service”? When did serving as either a Dracut Selectman or a School Committee member automatically become someone’s “career” or “profession”? I say, let’s roll the proverbial dice via a ballot referendum question, and see what happens.

Besides that, why not take a good hard look at the financial status of some of these people we're currently supporting with "free" Town health insurance: Atty. Malliaros, Warren Shaw, Bob Cox, May Gorman Paquette, and Kathleen DiTillio. If these people aren't all millionaires, then they're pretty darn close. I think it's fairly safe to say that these five individuals are probably worth more money right now than most people reading this particular posting will ever see in a lifetime. This begs the question, why can't these rich bastards just go out and buy their own personal family health insurance privately? If this isn't a "reversed Robin Hood" scenario, then I must be the Queen of England.

So throw Mercier back in with the aforementioned bunch and you’ve got six individuals, which if the Town’s share for each of their respective family health insurance plans is approximately $14,000 per year as was reported in the Lowell Sun, that would be a collective total of about $90,000 annually. Consider this – for $90,000 per year, Dracut could hire three (3) new teachers, OR, three (3) new firefighters, OR, three (3) new cops. Instead, Dracut is just blowing that amount of money on six (6) very wealthy individuals who are either not savvy enough, or not considerate enough to go out and buy their own family health insurance.

Lastly, I think it goes without saying, if nobody has the guts to bring this proposed ballot referendum question before the Board of Selectmen for final approval prior to the actual ballot being sent to the printer for publication on or before April 1st, my proposed offer to dissolve and terminate Dracut After Dark will automatically become null and void. If this ballot referendum question doesn’t get approved and published for the ‘09 Town Election, it ain’t going to take place at all.

I will just assume that everybody in Dracut loves Dracut After Dark, and absolutely hates that limp-wrist little wimp who runs that other Internet site in town. I'll also make it a definite point to bitch and complain every 4-5 months or so, about these stipend elected officials exploiting the Town of Dracut for their own personal benefit. In addition to that, my public media appearances will automatically increase from $25,000 per appearance to $35,000 per appearance. But then again, if you honestly believe what Warren Shaw stated in his recent column relevant to this subject that, “Jack DiTillio was NOT a wealthy man” then you’d have to agree with me that $35,000 is just a mere drop in the bucket.

Happy 2009, everybody!

I can hardly wait for Dracut’s “Good ‘Ol Boy Network” to sink in their teeth and start wagging their tongues over this latest proposal of mine.
Replies:
Subject: Drugs, Lies, and Polygraph Tape


Author:
Skippy Babcock
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:18 12/21/08 Sun

Word around the hot stove is that some "polygrapher" will soon be applying his craft...with some of Dracut's finest as his subjects. Aaahhh Man vs. Machine. Let the dance begin.
Replies:
Subject: Town officials assure residents that there will be lights at Canney Field


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:55 01/06/09 Tue

(published in, Lowell Sun, 1-6-09)

By Dennis Shaughnessey
dshaughnessey @lowellsun.com

DRACUT
-- When Canney Field is complete and there are ball fields, tennis and basketball courts and more, there also will be lighting.

Brian Bond, a member of the ad-hoc committee that is overseeing the project, has suggested that town officials are opposed to lights in and around the 15-acre parcel on Lakeview Avenue, but those same town officials squelched that notion in front of more than 60 people who attended last night's informational meeting.

"I don't think at any time that there was any opposition to lighting the park," said Selectman James O'Loughlin, a member of the committee. "There were questions asked at a previous meeting as to what the cost would be and there were concerns about maintenance and what type of lighting would be in, but I don't think anyone ever intended that this park would not be used after dark. Nobody should be leaving here with the idea that we will not have lights in the park."

Bond, in an e-mail sent to about 50 people, insinuated that there was strong opposition to installing lights at the future park, which will include a baseball diamond, a practice field for football, soccer and lacrosse, two basketball courts and two tennis courts, a small playground, a concession stand, more than 100 parking spaces and walking paths.

"Again, I'm reaching out to you and asking for your support affecting the future of the community," Bond wrote. "There is opposition by some in town not (sic) to install lighting at this time in the park and would like to install conduits for future lighting. Lighting of the walkways, courts, fields and parking has been one of the most important design elements of this park from the beginning. Please attend the information meeting in support of this important community project."

Town Meeting approved the expenditure of $1.42 million from the Community Preservation Fund in June 2008 to purchase the 15-acre parcel and an adjoining parcel from developer and Lowell City Councilor Alan Kazanjian, leaving some to question why Bond would seek support for something that has already been approved.

"I haven't heard any opposition tonight, but I have previously," Bond said.

At previous meetings, Town Manager Dennis Piendak said that if the plan was to install 8-foot poles around the walking path, he would be opposed.

"I expressed the opinion that that was not going to work," Piendak said. "I said we need something different."

Dale Harris, a project manager from the Norwell design firm of Coler and Colantonio, said the project is now before the Conservation Commission awaiting permitting before the town puts out a Request for Proposals (RFP). Residents peppered Harris with questions ranging from the size of the fields to the proximity of the fields to a nearby stream.

Harris said he expects the Conservation Commission to sign off on the project by February. Officials said that ground could be broken on the project by the spring of 2010.
Replies:
Subject: ASSUMING THAT A ELECTION FOR SELECTMAN WERE HELD TODAY WHO WOULD YOU VOTE FOR?DIROCCO,CUNHA,BOND,TEDDY K,OTHERS?


Author:
ELECTION
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:10 12/16/08 Tue

Replies:
Subject: DOES ANYBODY CARE ABOUT THE SMALL LOT OWNERS OF DRACUT?


Author:
SMALL LOT OWNER
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:55 12/28/08 Sun

Its about time that we all have equal rights on fixing our property.a good portion of our holmes were built a long time ago on small lots.

The laws are made for the people that have one acre lots and do not care about the small lot owners.The old original section of Dracut that was built in the 30's,40,50,are subject to unfair laws as we no it today.Spot zoning is good for all towns and is fair.Its time people speak up"
Replies:
Subject: Frank Gorman claims he's sleeping better at night now that his bankruptcy crap is all settled


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:04 01/04/09 Sun

(published in, Lowell Sun, 1-4-09)

Dracut developer looks to rebuild after Chapter 11

By Dennis Shaughnessey
dshaughnessey@lowellsun.com

DRACUT
-- Frank Gorman is breathing easier and sleeping better after having crawled out from under the Chapter 11 bankruptcy claim he filed 16 months ago after the reconstruction of the Beaver Brook Village on Lakeview Avenue.

Gorman says a reorganization plan was approved by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Joel Rosenthal on Dec. 24 and accepted by almost all of his 200 or so creditors.

"The last hearing was at 10 a.m. on Christmas Eve. The judge said he would take it under advisement," Gorman said. "Before he went to bed that night, he e-mailed everyone involved, informing them of his decision. The plan was approved. It was the best Christmas gift I could have asked for."

The plan calls for Gorman to distribute $130,000 to The Beaver Brook Village project, begun in 2002 at the five-story former textile mill on Lakeview Avenue, left Gorman with a $4 million debt. his creditors in the next week. Another $400,000 will be paid in the next three months and the balance is expected to be paid within the next six to 10 years.

"It's not cents on the dollar like a lot of people are saying," said Gorman. "That would have been the case under Chapter 7 bankruptcy and that would have put me out of business."

Under Chapter 11, debtors have the right to propose a reorganization plan that must satisfy a number of criteria to be approved by a bankruptcy court. Creditors must also sign off on the plan. Gorman said the plan was approved by 94 percent of his creditors. The other 6 percent represented two creditors, Gorman said, adding that a no vote doesn't negate his obligation to pay them.

"They may have voted no because they didn't understand the concept or maybe they were sending a message that they weren't happy," Gorman said. "Hey, I wasn't happy either. I didn't enjoy this. It was tough. I see all those people in coffee shops, in the supermarket, at the gas station. They know what kind of car I drive."

Rosenthal appointed a representative from the host of creditors, who attended the meetings and reported back to the rest. That representative, who did not want his name publicized, said that while the majority of creditors voted to accept the plan, nobody is happy about it.

"It's a tough situation. A lot of people lost a lot of money," said the representative. "We're looking at a minimal payout out front, which comes up to about 2 percent. Some of us are going to get tiny checks and others will get larger checks, depending on what he owed us. Everybody is going to get something, but it won't be much."

Would he work for Gorman again?

"It depends on the project and where the money is coming from," he said. "If we have a contract with a bank, if there's a way to protect ourselves, yeah, I'd work for Frank. I'm in business to make money. My company took a big hit, but I'm better off than most. There are some guys who lost everything. Frank left a lot of people very angry."

When Gorman filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Aug. 10, 2007, he owed his top 20 creditors, including Lowell attorney Louis Saab, more than $2.8 million. Attempts to reach Saab were unsuccessful.

To satisfy his debts, Gorman needed to come up with a plan that would bring him out of a $4 million hole. He infused new money into the reorganization plan and generated $1.8 million from the sale of as many as two dozen properties. He also sold the cell-phone antennae on the roof of the mills to Verizon, which had a 20-year lease, for $605,000.

He waived a $1.6 million debt from Beaver Brook Village to Gorman Management Trust, another entity he owns. Two pending insurance claims could bring in another $800,000. One of those claims stems from an the Mother's Day flood of 2006, which caused an estimated $800,000 in damages to the mills.

The 2007 filing is the second time Gorman has sought Chapter 11 protection. The first time was in 1990 when Gorman Management Trust had $4.5 million in unsecured debt. The trust filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy just 30 days after the Beaver Brook filing in 2007. In July 2008, the court agreed to join the two filings as one. At the time, Beaver Brook Village and $12 million in assets and $14 million in debt. The trust had $8.6 million in assets and $10 million in debt.

The Beaver Brook Village project began in 2002. The five-story former textile mill was converted into 47 affordable- and market-rate apartments, all of which are occupied. The one-story section of the building on Mill Street houses new and old commercial and retail businesses. The Verizon antennae are hidden in a flagpole on the roof.

"It's ironic when I look up at the flagpole on top of the building," Gorman said. "It represents the American dream. This project was my dream. It was my baby. I've lost everything, but I get to keep the mills."
Replies:
Subject: Who should be named Dracut After Dark’s “2008 Person of the Year”?


Author:
Nostradamus
[Edit]

Date Posted: 00:13 12/26/08 Fri

In the tradition of Time Magazine, Dracut’s undisputed best issues and information forum, Dracut After Dark, is conducting its search for this, our 4th Annual Person of the Year recipient. But unlike Time Magazine, it’ll be YOU, our beloved and faithful patrons, who’ll decide the winner of this highly prestigious honor.

THE RULES

You are limited, however, to choose from our list of 49 nominees. If something earth-shattering should occur in Dracut involving somebody outside this list of 49 nominees between now and New Year’s Eve, it’ll be the prerogative of this message board to add another nominee(s) to this list. We assume, however, that you’ll be more than content with the number of nominees you’ve got to choose from.

The name of the nominee you’re voting for must be listed in the “Subject” portion of your submitted message (it’s easier to count all the votes that way), and it must be submitted on this particular string. You’re free to vote as many times as you wish, HOWEVER, there are two small stipulations involved here for your vote to count:

1) You can only vote for one nominee per submitted post.

2) You must give AT LEAST one sentence as to why you’re voting for the nominee you support for Person of the Year, AND, your comment must be a verbatim original and not used previously for your nominee or any other nominee already posted.

I think it goes without saying, that you must adhere to the general rules for submitting messages listed in the disclaimer at the very top of this message board. Also, in the spirit of fairness, the reigning Person of the Year recipient (in this particular case, Frank Gorman) will automatically be disqualified for this current year’s nominees list. They will become eligible again for Person of the Year honors the following year (in two years) assuming, of course, they do something worthy enough to earn a spot on that year’s nominees list. I say, lets “spread the wealth” a little bit, and give everybody a fair shot to hold this highly prestigious Town-wide honor, at least for a year.

Voting will officially end at about 8 a.m., Wednesday, Dec. 31th.

Sometime on the morning of Monday, Dec. 29th, Dracut After Dark will TEMPORARILY cease to approve postings under this string in an effort not to taint the final vote outcome. Votes submitted Monday-Wednesday will then be approved for viewing on this site AFTER voting is closed on Wednesday morning.

‘08 Person of the Year award nominees that may need further explanation:

Arbitron ratings of Metro Boston, Canney’s Farm, Dash the Greyhound, Dracut Middies varsity boys football team, Forgery-gate
, and, Massachusetts General Law 32b may not exactly be considered a “person”, but Time Magazine also awarded its Person of the Year award several years ago to, “the personal computer”. Besides, I don’t think there’s any dispute that these respective entities have generated more than their share of controversy and/or excitement here in 2008.

Keep in mind, also, that the nominee chosen as, Person of the Year doesn’t necessarily had to have made a positive impact here in town. Time Magazine, for example, had Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden as its previous Persons of the Year. Although I would hardly equate any of these 49 nominees below to the evil impact both Hussein and bin Laden brought to the proverbial table, there are a handful of them that probably had more of a negative influence on the Dracut community than a positive one. We’re simply suggesting that someone construed as having a “negative influence on the Dracut community” shouldn’t automatically be disqualified from becoming our, Person of the Year.

In other words, this should NOT be viewed as a popularity contest but rather, which of these nominees brought forth the most compelling news and interest story (for better or worse) to Dracut in the past year?

If you’re confused as to who exactly some of these nominees are, please scroll through the Archive files of this message board – they’re all mentioned here, in one form or another.

’08 nominees for Dracut After Dark’s “Person of the Year”

Arbitron ratings of Metro Boston
Brian Bond
Canney’s Farm
Bob Cox
Joseph Cox
Roger L. Daigle
Dash the Greyhound
D.J. Deeb
Kathleen DiTillio
Joe DiRocco
Dennis Dockham
Dracut Middies varsity boys football team
Forgery-gate
Fred Fahey
Nancy Gagnon
Colleen Garry
Joseph Gleason
Matt Grimard
Donna Guziejka
Mary Karabatsos
Alan Kazanjian
Ted Kosiavelon
Steven R. Leonard
George Malliaros
Brian Martin
Ken Martin
Mary Gail Martin
Massachusetts General Law 32b
Gary McCarthy
Ron Mercier
Mike Miles
Jeff Moore
W. Spencer Mullin
George Nangle
Jim Ogonowski
Jim O’Loughlin
Victor Olson
Dennis Piendak
Kevin Richardson
Dennis Shaughnessey
Mark Shaw
Warren Shaw
Matt Sheehan
Russ Taylor
Ann Vandal
Leonard Wagner
Terry Wiggin
Tim Woods
John Zimini

On a very personal note, I think I speak on behalf of every single news and political junkie in Dracut by extending to each and every one of these 49 nominees a big, gigantic THANK YOU. In a sense, I think it’s a crying shame that 48 of these nominees (barring a tie, of course), will wind up with no Person of the Year award.

It’s people (and entities) like those listed in the aforementioned, who truly helped mold, shape and define Dracut over these past 12 months – not to mention, provided a ton of fuel for the proverbial fire to help make Dracut After Dark the undisputed #1 butt-kicking forum in town. I venture to say that if it weren’t for some of these “rabble rousers” stirring up the pot and pushing the envelope every now and then, this message board would probably cease to exist due to the fact that we wouldn’t have anything substantive to talk about.

Since this will probably be the Last Hurrah for 2008 on Dracut After Dark, you’re more than welcomed to post a “non-vote” message under this particular string on some of your personal thoughts from the news-related scene in town over the past 12 months, who are some possible nominees that should’ve made the aforementioned list and didn’t, and what are some of the “BIGGIE” events that you predict in ‘09?

Have fun, knock yourselves out, vote early, vote often, and we’ll reveal the winner of our ‘08 Person of the Year award sometime on the morning of New Year’s Eve.

Just remember: Don’t complain if you don’t vote!
Replies:
Subject: Watch Yours Truly this Sunday @ 9 p.m., on History Channel predict "Dooms Day" in about four years


Author:
Nostradamus via Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 19:30 01/01/09 Thu

(posted on, History.com . TV broadcast is scheduled on the History Channel this Sunday, Jan. 4th, @ 9 p.m.)

Nostradamus: 2012

Whatever is in store--a massive cosmic collision, a global environmental disaster, an Armageddon-like religious showdown, or a more subtle transformation--many believe that December 21, 2012 will mark a major shift in the history of our planet.

There is no cogent distinction between the sobering facts and hysterical fiction--what, if any, modern scientific proof exists? Is there any other compelling evidence throughout history that 2012 will be a year of unprecedented, deadly upheaval?

This special looks for the parallels between the nightmarish daily headlines and the 2012 prophecies from Nostradamus and others.

From the mystical realms of the Guatemalan jungles to the Hopi elders and Mayan shaman to respected thinkers of the modern age--Nostradamus' doomsday warning will be cast in a frighteningly modern context.
Replies:
Subject: Gorman's towers?


Author:
Charlie
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:24 12/09/08 Tue

Does anyone know if during the planned towers at the corner of Broadway and Loonhill were affected by Mr. Gorman’s bankruptcy procedures? I hope so, that project is too large for Dracut, it would be a better fit for Lowell.
Replies:
Subject: Brian & Mary Gail Martin really ought follow Dennis Williams’ example – minus the sexual groping of beautiful women


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:00 12/28/08 Sun

(published in, Lowell Sun, 12-28-08)

EXPECT A concerted effort by certain political insiders in Dracut to pressure Greater Lowell Technical School Board member Brian Martin and his wife, Dracut School Committee member Mary Gail Martin, to step down from their elected offices before the May 4 election.

The Martins have not hidden the fact that their Dracut home is for sale and they are thinking about moving into the Tyngsboro home formally owned by Martin's late mother.

"It would be the right thing to do," said one observer, adding that in 2004, former Selectman Dennis Williams stepped down from the board more than two months before moving to Nashua.

On the School Committee, a decision by Mary Gail Martin to relinquish her office would open a third slot on the ballot, perhaps prompting more interest from challengers in the race. It would also eliminate the necessity of appointing someone to fill out the remainder of her term, which ends in 2010.
Replies:
Subject: Jim O’Loughlin named, Dracut After Dark’s “Person of the Year” for ‘08


Author:
Nostradamus
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:47 12/31/08 Wed

Selectman Jim O’Loughlin, a.k.a. Jimmy O., who works as a sales representative for the Massachusetts State Lottery, emerged out of a field of 49 equally-worthy nominees this past week to be voted and named Dracut After Dark’s “Person of the Year” for 2008.

Congratulations Jimmy!

O’Loughlin has been a strong advocate this past year on the fiscal responsibility of the newly-acquired Canney Farm recreational area in the Collinsville section. He’s always very supportive to local charity events. He writes a weekly nostalgia column for the Lowell Sun. And perhaps the one thing that both Roger L. Daigle and myself respect about O’Loughlin the most – he’s the only Dracut Selectman who’s NOT enrolled on the Town employee’s health insurance coverage.

Jimmy O., led all the vote recipients this year with three votes. Nominees who were right on O’Loughlin’s heels with two votes included: Town Manager Dennis Piendak, School Committee member Matt Sheehan, unsuccessful Water Commissioner candidate Victor Olson, and the Dracut Knights of Columbus, Council #4225.

Among those who nabbed one vote in this five-day Internet election were: farmer/talk show host Warren Shaw, Agricultural Committee member Mark Shaw, Arbitron radio ratings of Metro Boston, high school Super Bowl champion Dracut Middies varsity boys football team, school Athletic Director Tim Woods, Dracut Middies football coach Jeff Moore, Governor’s Appointee to the Dracut Housing Authority George Nangle, Greater Lowell Voke Committee member Brian Martin, School Committee member Mary Gail Martin, contractor and unsuccessful Selectman’s candidate Ted Kosiavelon, and Lowell Sun reporter Dennis Shaughnessey.

Ironically, Jimmy O., who’s the most veteran member of the current Town Fathers, replaced Frank Gorman on the Dracut Board of Selectmen so it’s probably only fitting that O’Loughlin also proceeds Gorman as Dracut After Dark’s “Person of the Year” recipient.

For being named Dracut After Dark’s “Person of the Year”, aside from this wonderful write-up on our message board and the fact that he’s automatically disqualified from winning next year’s “Person of the Year Award”; for the mere sum of just $2, O’Loughlin will be able to buy himself a cup of coffee anywhere in Dracut.
Replies:
Subject: Who's more qualified: Sarah Palin as V.P., or, Caroline Kennedy as a U.S. Senator?


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:04 12/20/08 Sat

(published in, Boston Herald, Joe Fitzgerald's column, 12-20-08)

Sisterhood swoons at Caroline’s feet

By Joe Fitzgerald

Caroline Kennedy’s appalling belief she’s deserving of a seat in the U.S. Senate has the “sisterhood” in the media absolutely starry-eyed.

“There is something refreshing in seeing a mother and public citizen auditioning for a second act,” one gushed in yesterday’s Globe.

That’s not what they were saying about Sarah Palin.

Then again, Palin was on a collision course with that crowd from the get-go.

Happy in her marriage, active in her faith, grounded in basic American values and unapologetically patriotic, Palin never had a chance with these self-styled suffragettes whose chronic complaining appears to be their only joy in life.

She had been a mayor and was now a governor. In short, she brought credentials to the table. You might even say she’d paid her dues before setting her sights on the nation’s capital.

But it made no difference to her critics because, in their jaded eyes, Palin was politically incorrect.

Caroline Kennedy, conversely, has nothing at all to offer, other than being Caroline Kennedy, the much-admired daughter of a much-admired martyr.

But in vowing to be a Barack Obama acolyte, and allowing herself to be chaperoned through Harlem by the buffoonish Al Sharpton, she has quickly assured the lunatic fringe of the Democratic Party (a redundancy) that she has the right stuff to jump the line and grab a seat in the world’s most exclusive club.

So it comes as no surprise that the Pavlovian dogs of the far left are swooning over her as if she were the second coming of Eleanor Roosevelt.

Of course, she could rationalize her barren resume by pointing out the mess that’s been created by entrenched politicians, correctly suggesting experience is no guarantee for effective leadership.

Perhaps what’s most jarring about her ascendant candidacy is that it flies in the face of what made her so admired, and that was her determination to avoid attention, to maintain a life of quiet dignity.

Then she wakes up one morning and decides to be a U.S. senator? That’s it? Case closed?

Please. It’s her life, but it’s our government.

Then again, if a “community organizer” can become president with nothing more to offer than a prodigious gift of gab, perhaps Caroline Kennedy, who admits “I have a lot to learn,” will give Washington what it sorely needs, a breath of fresh air.
Replies:
Subject: Lowell Sun’s parent company in blatant fiscal crisis


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 23:46 12/29/08 Mon

(currently posted on, RichardHowe.com)

Posted by DickH on 29 Dec 2008 | Tagged as: Lowell, Technology

Earlier this month, Moody’s Investors Services downgraded almost $1 billion of the debt of the parent company of the Lowell Sun from B3 to Caa3. According to Moody’s, MediaNews Group (the owner of the Sun) has a “heightened probability of default” on these loans.

Corporate bond ratings are like an individual’s credit score: the worse the score, the harder it is to get credit and the higher the likelihood of default. To put things in perspective, here’s where the Sun’s owner’s new rating falls on the scale:

* Aaa – “Of highest quality with smallest degree of risk”

* Aa1, Aa2, Aa3 – “Of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk, but their susceptibility to long-term risks appears somewhat greater.

* A1, A2, A3 – Upper medium grade and subject to low credit risk, but have elements “present that suggest a susceptibility to impairment over the long-term.”

* Baa1, Baa2, Baa3 – Subject to moderate credit risk. Considered medium grade

Everything from here down is a “Junk Bond”

* Ba1, Ba2, Ba3 – Have “questionable credit quality.”

* B1, B2, B3 – Subject to high credit risk and have “generally poor credit quality.”

* Caa1, Caa2, Caa3 – Of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk, and have “extremely poor credit quality and may be In default.” (The Sun’s owner’s credit score is now Caa3)

* Ca – Highly speculative and usually in default

* C – Typically in default with low potential for recovery

Shortly after this announcement, the principal owner of MediaNews Group (Dean Singleton) met with the unions representing the employees of its flagship Denver Post and of the Denver Newspaper Agency (which jointly prints the Post and the Rocky Mountain News and is jointly owned by the two papers) and asked to reopen existing labor contracts to help identify $20 million in cuts.

Less than a week after that, the same Denver News Agency served these same unions with a letter demanding that the unions “agree to $20 million in wage and benefit concessions by January 16 or face even worse consequences.”

Finally (for now, at least), there was this Christmas Eve memo that was addressed to all employees participating in the MediaNews Group 401k plan:

“All of you are aware of the unprecedented challenges American businesses, and more specifically the newspaper industry, are facing today. MediaNews Group is not immune from these difficulties nor is it exempt from having to make hard business decisions. In an effort to operate our business as cost effectively as possible, the Company has made the decision to suspend all Company contributions and matches to the 401K Plan for 2009.”

What a thoughtful gift!
Replies:
Subject: I'd like to thank the Dracut Highway Department


Author:
Grateful resident
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:13 12/22/08 Mon

Once again, the roads in Dracut were by far the best plowed in the area. I was out and about on Sunday and after driving in Pelham, Lowell, and Methuen, I was never so glad to see the "Entering Dracut" sign. Thank you!
Replies:
Subject: Residents invited to hear about, speak on Canney Farm park plan


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:44 12/28/08 Sun

(published in, Lowell Sun, 12-28-08)

By Dennis Shaughnessey
dshaughnessey@lowellsun.com

DRACUT
-- Looking out upon the frozen landscape at Canney Farm on Lakeview Avenue, it may be hard to envision children playing baseball, frolicking on the tot lot, or adults enjoying the walking trails along the perimeter of the proposed park.

But as plans move forward, project organizers have scheduled a public information meeting for 7 p.m. on Jan. 5 at Harmony Hall. At that time, a representative of the park's design consultant, Coler and Colantonio, will go over the scope of the project and answer questions from the public.

"We want feedback," said Brian Bond, a member of an ad-hoc committee that has been overseeing the project. "We want to make sure that everyone is involved and everyone has their say."

Plans call for a senior baseball diamond, a practice field for football, soccer and lacrosse, at least three basketball/tennis courts, a tot lot designed for children under 10, a concession stand, ample parking and walkways that will accommodate access to and around the elements of the park.

Original plans also called for lighting, but Bond said some town officials have been reluctant to include that feature.

"I don't know if that's entirely accurate," said Selectman James O'Loughlin, a member of the ad-hoc committee. "At our last meeting, several people asked how much it would cost to install the lighting and maintain it. I didn't get the sense that anyone was opposed to lights. I think they just wanted to know the specifics."

Selectman John Zimini, also a member of the ad-hoc committee, said lighting has always been a crucial element of the project.

"It's something we talked about from the very beginning," Zimini said, adding that when Veterans Memorial Park was constructed on Broadway Road 10 years ago, lighting was not included. "I always thought that was a big mistake. The park is very popular, especially the walking paths. You need lights there."

In June, Town Meeting approved spending $1.42 million for the 15-acre parcel and an adjoining parcel on which a house and barn now sit. The property is owned by developer and Lowell City Councilor Alan Kazanjian. The money will come from the Community Preservation Fund. Soil tests were performed and a small amount of contamination was discovered in an area near the barn.

Kazanjian has agreed to pay for the cleanup, which consists of about three truckloads of dirt, according to Zimini.

"It's not a very big deal," Zimini said. "It probably stems from old gasoline tanks that were once used on the farm."

The project has met with several obstacles since its inception last year. Town Meeting initially approved spending $1.34 million for the property in November that year, with the intent of using the land for much-needed athletic fields.

Soon after that meeting, it was determined that the appraised value of the property was less than the town agreed to pay -- a violation of the use of Community Preservation funds. Kazanjian then included the small parcel with the house and barn. The new figure now includes $1.02 million for the original 15 acres, $250,000 for an adjoining parcel containing the abandoned house and barn, $100,000 for design costs, $75,000 of which will be paid to the design firm, and $50,000 to bond the project.
Subject: The Lowell Sun and Shake-Down Journalism


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 04:41 12/27/08 Sat

(Currently posted on, RichardHowe.com . We can only assume that the "ethically-challenged editor" in this particular context is, Jim "Compulsive Gambler" Campanini.)

Posted by DickH on 25 Dec 2008 at 06:25 pm | Tagged as: Lowell, Technology

Like the Ghost of Christmas Past, the ethically-challenged editor of the Lowell Sun clanged his way into our Christmas and published one of his thankfully rare and increasingly irrelevant columns in today’s paper to proclaim the continued good health of the newspaper. But to anyone who’s watched the decline of the paper through the years of his stewardship, the column has a “who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?” quality to it. With pages, reporters and ads all disappearing without trace or explanation, only those who depend on the paper for a paycheck believe the Sun is in good health.

But the editor’s feel-good fairy tale was tainted by a cheap shot at me and the story behind that illustrates just how he operates. Just a week ago today I was invited to the executive offices of the newspaper (by someone other than the ethically-challenged editor) to “discuss a project of historic importance.” With my curiosity piqued, I made my first (and undoubtedly last) visit to the Sun’s Dutton Street headquarters. The project of historic importance? A coming insert to honor the inauguration of Barack Obama. My role in it? To purchase an ad in the supplement. Here’s the price list:

* Back page - $3000

* Full page - $2500

* Half page - $1250

* Quarter page - $695

* Eighth page - $450

* Sixteenth page - $295

I politely declined and departed, suppressing the strong urge to comment either in person or on this blog on the utter hypocrisy of a newspaper that did everything in it power to prevent Obama from being elected president seeking now to profit from his victory with an advertising supplement.

Knowing how the ethically-challenged editor operates, however, I had no doubt that my “no thanks” would be followed by retaliation in print. I only had to wait a week. With a business model that punishes those who decline to buy ads with cheap shots in the paper, I suppose the paper will limp along for a bit longer until more people catch on to the hollowness of the Sun’s brand of shake-down journalism.

As for the ethically-challenged editor, he not only resembles a character from Dickens, but also one from popular culture. That would be Punxsutawney Phil. Like the groundhog whose shadow signals six more weeks of winter, we can now assume that a column by the editor signals six more weeks of the Lowell Sun.
Subject: School Committee OKs raises for teachers


Author:
Kopy Kitten
[Edit]

Date Posted: 19:57 12/10/08 Wed

(published in, Lowell Sun, 12-9-08)

By Dennis Shaughnessey
dshaughnessey@lowellsun.com

DRACUT
-- Without discussion, the School Committee last night approved a teachers' contract that amounts to an 8 percent raise over three years, retroactive to July 1, and extends to June 30, 2011.

The deal calls for a 2 percent increase from July 1, 2008, to the 90th day of the school year, and a 1 percent raise to June 30, 2009. Teachers will receive a 2.5 percent increase in each of the remaining years.

Only committee member Nancy Gagnon voted against the deal, which passed on a 4-to-1 vote.

"It's just not the right time," Gagnon said after the meeting. "We're hearing about (Gov. Deval Patrick's) budget cuts, and the possibility of layoffs is real. I don't want to take that chance. I have the utmost respect for our teachers and the job they do, but I believe that we have to be cautious for the time being."

It was unclear last night how much the salary increase will add to the budget. In March, the School Committee agreed to a one-year, 3 percent raise, retroactive to July 1, 2007, when the teachers' former contract expired. Contract negotiations for the current contract began in May.

Union President Joyce Desjardin briefly addressed the committee before the vote and said teacher salaries in Dracut remain 10 percent lower than the state average, according to figures from the Department of Education.

"Competition exists among area communities for a limited number of qualified education professionals," Desjardins said. "Dracut has faced a challenge of enticing these professionals into its employment openings in recent years.

They have been leery that a long-term contractual commitment was not in place, and they were receiving offers that were substantially higher in other communities."

Gary Marsella, who chairs the town's Finance Committee and attended last night's meeting, offered little comment on the pact.

"I wasn't in the negotiations," he said. "I don't know what (the committee) was faced with. I don't know what the union was asking for. I know that that's why we elect a school committee, and it's one of their functions."

Asked how the contract stands in light of looming budget cuts from the state, committee member Mike Miles said he came to his decision while he was driving to the meeting.

"I went back and forth, and I came to the conclusion that the raise was in order," Miles said. "You look at all the accomplishments that are taking place in the Dracut public school system and ask yourself, 'How do you not support a raise?'"
Replies:

Now More Than Ever

Please help spread the word about, Dracut After Dark to all your friends, relatives, co-workers, and neighbors around town. It's crucial that we have, at least, one media outlet in this community that TELLS IT THE WAY IT REALLY IS. Let the people of Dracut have the opportunity to check out Dracut After Dark for themselves and draw their own conclusions. We’re constantly striving to become our town’s consummate underground network outlet. Thank you so much for your continued support to this message board as we appreciate it very, very, very much. Adios, and hope to see you again real soon.

P.S. Always remember and never forget -- It's all about the ISSUES, stupid.

Lookup a word or passage in the Bible



BibleGateway.com
Include this form on your page

LINKS: Please check out these fascinating and informative local websites, which come highly recommended by the management of this forum: Official Town of Dracut website; Dracut Pop Warner football & cheerleading; Dracut's lowest gas prices; Dracut's restaurant directory; NObama Network; How Obama Got Elected; Warren Shaw.com (Deeb's view on Warren Shaw); Dracut School Department; Dracut Assessor Online; Property Deeds; Obituaries; Citizens for Limited Taxation; National Organization for Marriage; Tewksbury Issues; Dracut Street Map; Helpful Dracut websites; Official State Website; Official Federal Government Website; Storm-related Public Closings; Dracut After Dark’s blog; Howie Carr; Charlie Baker for Governor; Scott Brown for U.S. Senate; and Anonymous Proxy Server.

Some of my personal favorites sites include: Teen Challenge; Youth Storm (local Christian youth ministry); Battle Cry (national Christian teen ministry); Unclaimed Money/Property; Reverse telephone number & address lookup; Curt Schilling's baseball blog; Town Hall; Hot Air; Laura Ingraham; Deval Patrick Watch; Federal Bailout Stimulus; New England Patriot's Fan Club; Boston Red Sox Fan Club; Boston Celtics News; Person Locator; Online World of Wrestling; D-Tension; Singer/D.J. Sharon DiFronzo; New England Stone Masonry; Whatever Happened To?; Washed Up Celebrities; and Dead or Alive?.

Site Meter

free web counters

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.