Re: You have to undstand science first -- Margaritaville NFL Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:37:43 09/03/15 Thu
Author: Niner
Author Host/IP: 66.87.119.9
Subject: Re: You have to undstand science first
In reply to: C-Hawk Watcher 's message, "I am using logic and science..you should try it" on 11:39:04 08/26/15 Wed

>Which text are you referring to that proves Brady knew?
>
>10/17/14:
>McNally: Tom sucks...im going make that next ball a
>fuckin balloon
>Jastremski: Talked to him last night. He actually
>brought you up and
>said you must have a lot of stress trying to get them
>done...
>Jastremski: I told him it was. He was right though...
>Jastremski: I checked some of the balls this morn...
>The refs fucked
>us...a few of then were at almost 16
>Jastremski: They didnt recheck then after they put air
>in them
>McNally: Fuck tom ...16 is nothing...wait till next
>sunday
>Jastremski: Omg! Spaz
>
>10/24/14:
>Jastremski: I have a big needle for u this week
>McNally: Better be surrounded by cash and
>newkicks....or its a rugby
>sunday
>McNally: Fuck tom
>Jastremski: Maybe u will have some nice size 11s in ur
>locker
>McNally: Tom must really be working your balls hard
>this week
>
>10/25/14:
>Jastremski: Size 11?
>Jastremski: 2 or 3X?
>McNally: Tom must really be on you
>McNally: 11 0r 11 half......2x unless its tight fitting
>Jastremski: Nah. Hasn‟t even mentioned it,
>figured u should get
>something since he gives u nothing
>
>What was the rule for punishment for under inflating
>game balls in the CBA?
>
>My understanding...Commissioner's discreation
>
>Why did the Well report claim that Boyle's Law doesn't
>exist? Where did they get the science to disprove that
>air pressure decreases as temperature decreases?
>
>What the fuck are you talking about? The report
>stated the obvious (for anyone who cares to understand
>science)..both sets would've been affected the same
>way. However, at halftime:
>
>Patriots Ball Blakeman Prioleau
>1 11.50 11.80
>2 10.85 11.20
>3 11.15 11.50
>4 10.70 11.00
>5 11.10 11.45
>6 11.60 11.95
>7 11.85 12.30
>8 11.10 11.55
>9 10.95 11.35
>10 10.50 10.90
>11 10.90 11.35
>Colts Ball Blakeman Prioleau
>1 12.70 12.35
>2 12.75 12.30
>3 12.50 12.95
>4 12.55 12.15
>
>The report states SPECIFICALLY:
>
>Our consultants confirmed that a reduction in air
>pressure is a natural result of footballs moving from
>a relatively warm environment such as a locker room to
>a colder environment such as a playing field.
>According to our scientific consultants, however, the
>reduction in pressure of the Patriots game balls
>cannot be explained completely by basic scientific
>principles, such as the Ideal Gas Law, based on the
>circumstances and conditions likely
>to have been present on the day of the AFC
>Championship Game. In addition, the average pressure
>drop of the Patriots game balls exceeded the average
>pressure drop of the Colts balls by 0.45 to 1.02 psi,
>depending on various possible assumptions regarding
>the gauges used, and
>assuming an initial pressure of 12.5 psi for the
>Patriots balls and 13.0 psi for the Colts balls.
>
>Unless you believe that the Patriots sideline was
>massively different than the Colt sideline. Again,
>you obviously lack any logical thinking here.
>
>
>I understand that you refuse to use any logic in this
>and have yet to show any on why Brady deserves 4 games
>much like the Wells report was a witch hunt to try to
>prove a case with no evidence.
>
>Absolutely false...however, as you have shown, you
>have either a complete lack of knowledge of science
>and are incapable of using logic, or you just have
>decided that logic and science don't matter and
>neither does the CBA or punishing cheating ass
>cheaters.
>
>4 games for fucking with the integrity of the game
>seems like the low end to me. But then again, I use
>logic and science and common damn sense.

And then use logic and common sense. The balls were measured by theeagle before the game and found to be within spec. You can't change the rules afterward!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Apparently you don't understand the concept of time -- C-Hawk Watcher, 11:44:51 09/03/15 Thu
- Re: Apparently you don't understand the concept of time -- Niner, 13:15:01 09/03/15 Thu
  - I disagre with judge, Sex. harrassment DOES NOT equal intergrity of game -- C-Hawk Watcher, 11:36:07 09/04/15 Fri