Friday, May 2, 2008 - New servers are in! Click-in for more info!
VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:14:59 03/22/08 Sat
Author: p
Subject: I am not disagreeing with you, I was only offering why Harm was able to win the case. It's easy to sit on the sidelines and judge. Realize that Mac is a very skill ligator. She got Buxton to admit to actions that may have or may not have been true. Yes he was itching for combat, but he thought he was operating properly
In reply to: Jubellant 's message, "Sorry p have to disagree with you. If Buxton had followed protocol he would have learned that the Yugo's were in the area. Pilots have to have impeccable vision and he probably would have noticed the flag. By his own admission he was itching for a fight, boasted that they would see and stated they looked close enough. Even Harm said he did what he had to and declined to defend the guy further. Buxton's life was not in any danger and the Russians had let command know that they would be in the area. Many countries assist those who cannot afford their own equipment or things are bought 2nd hand. This could have all been avoided IMHO." on 03:02:21 03/18/08 Tue

It still doesn't change the facts that the Russian and Serbian vehicles look too much alike. There should be more distinguishing markings.

A flag where the colors and style of the flags are the same isn't enough. Many people could look the same flags twenty feet away and would tell you that they are the same flags.


Less not forget that this episode demostrated the different styles of Harm and Mac. They are both very good but different.

Remember also Harm in the seasons 2-4 always won when it was in the best interest of the Navy for him to win.

In this case it was in the Navy's best interest that he won.

As was also shown the Navy has more than one way to remove unwanted personnel.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> Harm was grasping at straws to appeal to the jury. Because of Buxton's zealousness for some action, he failed to take the steps necessary to avoid making a deadly mistake. Safeguards are there for a reason. Imagine being killed because you looked close enough to a suspect because you were the same height and had the same hair color. What Harm's argument did was put the whole thing in a context of what if rather than what it was. Buxton would not have been prosecuted for failing to act if he followed the protocol that was set up to safeguard mishaps like these. Buxton's close enough comment was enough for me not to give him the benefit of the doubt that his motives were altruistic. Interesting points p but we'll just have to disagree on this one. -- Jubellant, 17:10:50 03/22/08 Sat


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[Edit]




VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

* Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.