VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]56 ]
Subject: Re: NEW STUD ON THE BLOCK


Author:
HARDHEAD
Author Host/IP: 24.174.55.149
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 12:43:36 03/03/06 Fri
In reply to: Mike Norrod 's message, "Re: NEW STUD ON THE BLOCK" on 07:54:38 03/03/06 Fri

>Well since you brought our kennel name into it, then
>maybe I better finally respond.
>
>A lot you said about Hardhead is true. IMO I also
>don't think he needs to breeding dogs but most of all
>selling them if you had no experince with the breed of
>the purpose you are breeding for..
>If you want to breed and keep them all and work with
>them, then I could possibly understand wanting more
>stock to work with. But him breeding untested stock,
>BTW TESTED not short look ats but most or all,,shown
>first, I think this isn't the best way to start out.
>
>BTW There is some dogs Mary had I would have bred to
>or took from her yard. Maud came from her yard.
>Another good one was Rocky who was much better dog
>then his cur brother Rusty. Mary also had dogs bred
>like Mitzie in some of her dogs I would have also took
>or bred too but their is also many of them I didn't
>care for and the direction she went with some of her
>dogs. To bad she personally didn't work or stay in
>dogs long enough for her to personally prove her
>directions she went in her breeding programs.
>
>As many dogs in history people will always debate the
>quality of certain dogs. Anyone which has had a few
>years around the game knows by looking at dogs and
>telling by how they interact with other dogs, if they
>have ever been look at.
>Many dogs were given credit for things which you could
>look at them and see they hadn't.
>At the time no claims or reports to state they had.
>None were open to show.
>Some these were Trouble, Jean's Reno and Killian's
>Cid, etc. But to debate this at this time and age
>would only upset people so I'm NOT commenting about
>Sarona dogs or anyone Else's....
>
>But I'm not paying Hardheads food bill nor will I be
>buying a pup from that litter for these very reasons
>because once they are bred, they are retired here. I
>feel if he sells pups off dogs which ends up quiting
>later on then he should return everyone's money who
>bought a pup because they weren't tested at the time
>of the breeding or should I say culled for whatever
>purpose he was breeding for, He is experimenting at
>JRB expense. I don't think JRB needs someone else
>breeding his dogs, I think he would like people out
>there proving his line of dogs not just peddling them.
>
>I seen Hardhead posts pups for sale all over the
>Internet. I would have hoped before he breed he
>already had homes or buyers for the pups before he did
>the breeding.
>That way he could keep better track of them.
>But then again, it's only my opinion. I think there is
>to many people breeding dogs that doesn't have the
>experience at what purpose they are breeding for.....
>
>From my understanding of JRB is if you were doing it
>right and trying to prove his line of dogs and they
>weren't working out at first, I'm sure he is the type
>of breeder and dogman who be more then willing to work
>closely and personally with that person because that
>person is helping him as well to know certain things
>are far as which breeding are better then others and
>which direction to breed.
>
>I also would think JRB would be more then reasonable
>with the prices if he would even charge a player at
>all...
>I know I wouldn't. :)
>
>These are only my opinions but most of all, it is none
>of my business and to each there own.
>
>If a buyer wants one, knows all the facts pertaining
>to the breeding, knows the quality of the dogs and
>understands the deal, so be it! Good luck because this
>isn't the norm for producing quailty dogs. JMO


IM NOT SURE WHAT YOU MEAN BY "YOUR NAME WAS BROUGHT UP"???

FOR THE PUPS FROM MY LITTER FROM PASSION 2-3 WILL BE 4SALE.... 4-5 OF THE 7 ARE STAYING HERE OR GOING TO MY BUDDIES YARD..... AGAIN ITS OKAY PEOPLE HAVE THERE OPINIONS I HAVE MINE..

AS FOR THE MALE FROM JRB HE WILL NOT BE BRED FOR A WHILE... AS I DONT KNOW WHAT HES FULLY CAPABLE OF..... NOR DO I HAVE THE FEMALE PICKED OUT TO TAKE TO HIM.....
AS FOR WHAT ME AND JRB WORKED OUT ON THE ANIMALS WAS ABOUT AS REASONABLE AS IT GETS...
JUDGE IS A GOOD MAN TO WORK WITH...

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: NEW STUD ON THE BLOCKjrb
(206.116.33.170)
19:26:19 03/03/06 Fri

Re: NEW STUD ON THE BLOCKMike Norrod
(67.177.152.140)
09:05:42 03/04/06 Sat


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.