Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6 ] |
| Subject: Re: DANGER THIS IS NO JOKE | |
|
Author: malinda Author Host/IP: 152.163.100.197 |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 17:21:52 01/19/06 Thu In reply to: BILLYT 's message, "DANGER THIS IS NO JOKE" on 08:53:27 01/19/06 Thu >Danger or who ever you are,this is no joke.I don't >have any >dogs anymore.I come here every once in awhile.The web >site >was given to Rosie and she is doing well with it. >I spent almost half my life with the dogs.You refer to >dogs >that I bred that there under suspecion as far as the >breedings and ability go.You pointed out that Morgan >has or has some decent stock. >If you look close you'll find out that he has dogs I >bred in his pedigrees. >Mike is one of the few that stuck with it trying to >make the dogs worth their weight. >I made a big blunder 30yrs ago in adds calling them >ofrn. >If you look at those old adds it states that as most >all >knew or thought anything with a red nose was a true >ofrn. >If you read adds by Bob Hemphill in 67 he states that >he added 1/8 of dibo blood into his ofrn >stock.Therefore there was then as before no pure ofrn >dogs alive. >I bred the dogs I had alone and then with Morgan and >Woods. >They were bred as the pedigree states good or bad as >far as they turned out. >If you look at the Sorona pedigrees you would see that >it was made up of >CLOUSE-WILDER-HEMPHILL-COLBY-DIBO-CRENSHAW AND THE >LIST GOES ON AND ON. >I stated my apology's on here long ago for calling the >dogs I bred ofrn. >I also stated that they did have fractions of the >blood.I also stated that there was not a dog liveing >that one could call 100% pure old family rednose. >I don't understand where one gets the idea that >somehow the dogs I bred were not bred as such or for >what reasons. >I did however breed the rednose dogs for a legit >reason.When I got into bring the cowboy dogs and >dissabled >I bred them to pay for their keep and to provide for >the other dogs as far as >food-medical-linceing-houseing etc etc. >If you are in the know you would relize that some of >the big names have used these dogs in their breedings. >If your in the know you will not see the names of the >dogs as many donot want one to know the secret that is >going on. >whether one calls the ofrn or just plain rednose with >a % of ofrn blood one would be amazed at just how many >dogs are carrying some of the blood that flows through >their vaines. >Nobody wants to hear the truth that there is not ONE >repeat Not ONE that can say without a doubt that their >dogs pedigree is correct 100% and that is fact. >For the breeders today if one wants to call them what >they want that is there problem. >As far as someone in the know about the ofrn dogs it >has to be Mike Norrod.For what its worth he has what I >believe is the closes to being the highest % of >rednose or ofrn blood today. >Also although there are the so called exsperts out >there >in truth there is nobody that can without a doubt call >their dogs pedigree 100% ture. >Kind of like RIPLEYS BELIEVE IT OR NOT. >But all stains will produce a red rednose dog and >those who have them will label them either rednose or >ofrn. >Those that know this will state they are not what many >view >just because of a nose color. >To each his or her own call it like it is. >But this down gradeing of a person is what gets things >going and it causes confusion. >Know what your talking about and for the record I do >agree with you on no such thing as ofrn. very well said glad to see your still out there good to see you are still putting it out there for people to know [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |