Mon, Dec 18 2017, 1:14:07VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:55:56 07/10/17 Mon
Author: for some odd reason
Subject: This committee went way beyond any previous NANS committee to provide all sorts of information -FREE! All those who are complaining are going to limit what the next committee provides. Can't imagine friends not sharing the split along with dancer numbers to friends; pretty much every parent there posted pictures to FB of dancers, with numbers.
In reply to: Wish All Online for Everyone 's message, "Would be nice to see/buy the comp book/lists online whether attending or not. I knew some of the competitor numbers but not which comp (A or B) they were in so didn't help so much. Also nice to be able to search lists online." on 07:53:24 07/10/17 Mon

Had many friends across many competitions; EACH and EVERY mom (and 2 dads) posted to FB and texted splits and dancer numbers to us. From very casual friends from other schools to close friends in school.

Most schools had own messaging systems going sharing who was coming up and in what split and posted pictures, too, be it on FB or other sites.

Why is it, just a few people didn't have any access to information? So much was out there.

All of you complaining about not getting names with numbers are just nosey about who was recalled and who wasn't, not from your own school, for some odd reason. (some would ask if you stalk much?)

So, they didn't give names on the last two days. The committee clearly posted this on FB and other social media and explained it was to expedite things. The recalls were really for those who were there, not the nosey ones sitting at home.

The people who really needed to know who recalled and who didn't were the dancers there. It was a lovely benefit to the rest of us to know this as well, but sadly, some of you are so greedy and selfish for information, you have to go on about not getting names - when it didn't truly concern you.

If you really had friends there competing, you knew the dancers' numbers and the splits. Don't say otherwise. Sorry, just excuses for stalking others.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


  • Splits were posted on website and available all week. All recalls place at awards. Awards were so timely you almost did not need recalls. (NT) -- 3-4 hours wait at most., 18:32:46 07/10/17 Mon
  • It's the entitlement of some who want all the work done for them. Too hard to scan through the lists for A and B to figure it out. The splits had been posted for two or three weeks and available. Would have been easy to connect Friends' numbers to the correct split. (NT) -- but too hard for some to do, 00:07:56 07/11/17 Tue

    VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
    Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
    * HTML allowed in marked fields.
    Message subject (required):

    Name (required):

      Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

      E-mail address (optional):

    Type your message here:

    Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

    Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2017 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.