Governments and Citizens Urged: Go for Zero Waste, Reject Incineration -- ECOSUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY

05/24/13 0:58 [ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Governments and Citizens Urged: Go for Zero Waste, Reject Incineration

Author:
GAIA Secretariat
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 05/23/04 10:19
Author Host/IP: 222-152-23-180.jetstream.xtra.co.nz/222.152.23.180
Governments and Citizens Urged:
Go for Zero Waste, Reject Incineration

21 April 2004, USA, Manila. On the eve of Earth Day 2004, a global environmental health coalition today launched a report that promises a sustainable remedy to the rising waste problems in developing countries. The report Resources up in Flames: The Economic Pitfalls of Incineration versus a Zero Waste Approach in the Global South was released by the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA), who challenged policy makers to redirect the millions of dollars lined up for incinerators into waste prevention and reduction and zero waste systems. Says Ann Leonard, GAIA Co-Coordinator: “Incineration encourages a one-way flow of materials on a finite planet. It makes the task of conserving resources and reducing waste more difficult, not easier. Policy makers and citizens need to work together to advance sustainable community-based solutions, without incineration. ”

According to Resources up in Flames, prepared by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) in Washington, D.C. for GAIA, municipal solid waste incinerators—no matter where they are built—have numerous liabilities. In addition to generating pollution and harming public health, they:

· Place huge financial burdens on host communities;
· Drain local communities of financial resources;
· Waste energy and materials;
· Thwart local economic development;
· Undermine waste prevention and rational approaches to discard management;
· Have an operating experience checkered with problems;
· Can go financially bankrupt from tonnage shortfalls; and
· Often leave citizens and taxpayers paying the bill.

At least 16 jurisdictions worldwide have banned or restricted municipal solid waste incineration. Chicago, California’s Alameda County, and Rhode Island are U.S. examples. The Philippines is the first country to explicitly ban all types of waste incineration.

Brenda Platt, Co-Director of ILSR and the primary author of the report, asks: “Why invest millions of dollars in a technology that at the end of 30 years leaves you with a pile of potentially toxic ash, when that same money could be redirected to readily available cheaper and safer options that create many more jobs, new businesses, and wealth for local communities.” The report indicates that just sorting recyclables alone in the U.S. can sustain at least 11 times the number of jobs as incineration on a per-ton basis.

While the report introduces the concept and need for zero waste planning and highlights the growing worldwide zero-waste movement and numerous examples of communities embracing such an approach, it emphasizes that non-burn alternatives are within reach of communities today and can pay immediate economic dividends. In the global South, where organic material—yard trimmings and food scraps—is the single largest component of the waste stream, appropriately designed composting programs will be the easiest, quickest, and least-expensive method to divert discards from disposal.

Resources up in Flames: The Economic Pitfalls of Incineration versus a Zero Waste Approach in the Global South is a 75-page report, supported by more than 100 footnotes. It contains hard-hitting facts, model programs, and failed incinerator examples. The first half of the report is devoted to the economic problems posed by incinerators and includes a section on how to evaluate a planned incinerator. The second half focuses on non-burn alternatives readily available, and concludes with a 10-step plan for getting starting on the path toward zero waste at the local level. The report is available as a PDF file on GAIA’s web site, located at http://www.no-burn.org. It is being translated into more than a dozen languages. Resources up in Flames is the third report published by GAIA since it was formed in December 2000. GAIA released The World Bank Group and Incineration: Bankrolling Dirty Technologies in 2002 and Waste Incineration: A Dying Technology in 2003.

GAIA is an international alliance of community-based organizations, research and policy advocacy institutions, citizen pressure groups and other nonprofit organizations and individuals working to end the burning of all types of discards and to promote clean production, zero waste, and sustainable waste management systems. It has offices in Quezon City, the Philippines and Berkeley, California. For more information on GAIA, log onto its web site at www.no-burn.org.

Media contacts:

Gigie Cruz/Abigail Jabines, GAIA Secretariat, Manila Philippines - gigie.gaia@no-burn.org
Tel: + 63 2 929 0376, Fax: + 63 2 436 4733 Mobile: + 639205956958
for US Press Monica Wilson, GAIA, Berkeley- mwilson@essential.org
for Latin American Press Cecilia Allen, GAIA, Argentina - cecilia.allen@no-burn.org

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

* Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Governments and Citizens Urged: >Go for Zero Waste, Reject Incineration > >21 April 2004, USA, Manila. On the eve of Earth Day >2004, a global environmental health coalition today >launched a report that promises a sustainable remedy >to the rising waste problems in developing countries. >The report Resources up in Flames: The Economic >Pitfalls of Incineration versus a Zero Waste Approach >in the Global South was released by the Global >Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA), who >challenged policy makers to redirect the millions of >dollars lined up for incinerators into waste >prevention and reduction and zero waste systems. Says >Ann Leonard, GAIA Co-Coordinator: “Incineration >encourages a one-way flow of materials on a finite >planet. It makes the task of conserving resources and >reducing waste more difficult, not easier. Policy >makers and citizens need to work together to advance >sustainable community-based solutions, without >incineration. ” > >According to Resources up in Flames, prepared by the >Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) in >Washington, D.C. for GAIA, municipal solid waste >incinerators—no matter where they are built—have >numerous liabilities. In addition to generating >pollution and harming public health, they: > >· Place huge financial burdens on host communities; >· Drain local communities of financial resources; >· Waste energy and materials; >· Thwart local economic development; >· Undermine waste prevention and rational approaches >to discard management; >· Have an operating experience checkered with problems; >· Can go financially bankrupt from tonnage shortfalls; >and >· Often leave citizens and taxpayers paying the bill. > >At least 16 jurisdictions worldwide have banned or >restricted municipal solid waste incineration. >Chicago, California’s Alameda County, and Rhode Island >are U.S. examples. The Philippines is the first >country to explicitly ban all types of waste >incineration. > >Brenda Platt, Co-Director of ILSR and the primary >author of the report, asks: “Why invest millions of >dollars in a technology that at the end of 30 years >leaves you with a pile of potentially toxic ash, when >that same money could be redirected to readily >available cheaper and safer options that create many >more jobs, new businesses, and wealth for local >communities.” The report indicates that just sorting >recyclables alone in the U.S. can sustain at least 11 >times the number of jobs as incineration on a per-ton >basis. > >While the report introduces the concept and need for >zero waste planning and highlights the growing >worldwide zero-waste movement and numerous examples of >communities embracing such an approach, it emphasizes >that non-burn alternatives are within reach of >communities today and can pay immediate economic >dividends. In the global South, where organic >material—yard trimmings and food scraps—is the single >largest component of the waste stream, appropriately >designed composting programs will be the easiest, >quickest, and least-expensive method to divert >discards from disposal. > >Resources up in Flames: The Economic Pitfalls of >Incineration versus a Zero Waste Approach in the >Global South is a 75-page report, supported by more >than 100 footnotes. It contains hard-hitting facts, >model programs, and failed incinerator examples. The >first half of the report is devoted to the economic >problems posed by incinerators and includes a section >on how to evaluate a planned incinerator. The second >half focuses on non-burn alternatives readily >available, and concludes with a 10-step plan for >getting starting on the path toward zero waste at the >local level. The report is available as a PDF file on >GAIA’s web site, located at http://www.no-burn.org. It >is being translated into more than a dozen languages. >Resources up in Flames is the third report published >by GAIA since it was formed in December 2000. GAIA >released The World Bank Group and Incineration: >Bankrolling Dirty Technologies in 2002 and Waste >Incineration: A Dying Technology in 2003. > >GAIA is an international alliance of community-based >organizations, research and policy advocacy >institutions, citizen pressure groups and other >nonprofit organizations and individuals working to end >the burning of all types of discards and to promote >clean production, zero waste, and sustainable waste >management systems. It has offices in Quezon City, the >Philippines and Berkeley, California. For more >information on GAIA, log onto its web site at >www.no-burn.org. > >Media contacts: > >Gigie Cruz/Abigail Jabines, GAIA Secretariat, Manila >Philippines - gigie.gaia@no-burn.org >Tel: + 63 2 929 0376, Fax: + 63 2 436 4733 Mobile: + >639205956958 >for US Press Monica Wilson, GAIA, Berkeley- >mwilson@essential.org >for Latin American Press Cecilia Allen, GAIA, >Argentina - cecilia.allen@no-burn.org
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.
The Voy.com User Agreement applies to all visitors.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+10
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.