Re: STILL DOING RECTAL TEMPS AFTER ALL THESE YEARS -- Doctors who made House Calls Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

Subject: Re: STILL DOING RECTAL TEMPS AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

Author:
SF to Knuit Holt

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Monday, May 09, 2016, 10:53: am
In reply to: longtermresearcher 's message, "STILL DOING RECTAL TEMPS AFTER ALL THESE YEARS" on Thursday, March 10, 2016, 08:40: pm

Why are they still treating "reflexive rectal dilation" as a sign of sexual abuse in childhood? That idea was discredited thirty years ago as a result of the Dr Marietta Higgs phony "mass child abuse" scandal, in which not only were the accusations proved false but the medical test (for reflexive rectal dilation) on which the accusations were founded was proved to be worthless

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Re: STILL DOING RECTAL TEMPS AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

Author:
Knuit Holt
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Thursday, May 12, 2016, 04:27: am

They perfomrd a so-called scientific project in the 1990es where they compared children they knew, or thought they new had been subjected to abuse, with children they presumed had not been abused to find differences. And they say this symptoms still stands as valid for sign of sexual abuse.

But they say that nearly any deviation of behavior, is such a sign.

Norwegian authorities are hysterical regarding sexual abuse, and use an absurdly wide definition of sexual abuse, and this mental state of people in authority makes them unable to think clearly.

I think this project was metodically flawed. If you think beforehand that you will get a special reaction from a child, one is very much inclined to do a test in such a way that the reaction occurs, and negotiate the manner and handling until the reaction occurs.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]