VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]345678910 ]
Subject: Re: Oldies but goodies


Author:
Lew
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 00:24:37 04/06/15 Mon
In reply to: Jon 's message, "Re: Oldies but goodies" on 21:56:15 04/05/15 Sun

>>Another is the Boeing 737 still the work horse of many
>>airlines. One of the few jets that can land on a
>>gravel runway.
>
>Possibly answering my own question: high mounted
>engine intakes are less able to inhale debris (pebbles
>or small rocks) that would damage the turbine blades?
>
>Jon

The engines on the 737 hang under the wings. If it indeed is certified to use gravel runways there must be features Boeing designed in to make it possible.

Lew

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Oldies but goodies


Author:
Mike
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:33:34 04/06/15 Mon

>>>Another is the Boeing 737 still the work horse of
>many
>>>airlines. One of the few jets that can land on a
>>>gravel runway.
>>
>>Possibly answering my own question: high mounted
>>engine intakes are less able to inhale debris (pebbles
>>or small rocks) that would damage the turbine blades?
>>
>>Jon
>
>The engines on the 737 hang under the wings. If it
>indeed is certified to use gravel runways there must
>be features Boeing designed in to make it possible.
>
>Lew

He was probably thinking of the 727, which has the engines high up on the tail of the aircraft.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Oldies but goodies


Author:
Jon
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:15:49 04/06/15 Mon

>>>>Another is the Boeing 737 still the work horse of
>>many
>>>>airlines. One of the few jets that can land on a
>>>>gravel runway.
>>>
>>>Possibly answering my own question: high mounted
>>>engine intakes are less able to inhale debris
>(pebbles
>>>or small rocks) that would damage the turbine blades?
>>>
>>>Jon
>>
>>The engines on the 737 hang under the wings. If it
>>indeed is certified to use gravel runways there must
>>be features Boeing designed in to make it possible.
>>
>>Lew
>
>He was probably thinking of the 727, which has the
>engines high up on the tail of the aircraft.

I was thinking of the 727.

Silly me, the 737 is dual engined, underslung from the wings.
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Oldies but goodies


Author:
wexwiz543
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:41:06 04/06/15 Mon

>>>Another is the Boeing 737 still the work horse of
>many
>>>airlines. One of the few jets that can land on a
>>>gravel runway.
>>
>>Possibly answering my own question: high mounted
>>engine intakes are less able to inhale debris (pebbles
>>or small rocks) that would damage the turbine blades?
>>
>>Jon
>

There is a gravel kit option for the B737. See link below

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravelkit

wex
>The engines on the 737 hang under the wings. If it
>indeed is certified to use gravel runways there must
>be features Boeing designed in to make it possible.
>
>Lew
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Oldies but goodies


Author:
wexwiz543
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:47:14 04/16/15 Thu

>>>>Another is the Boeing 737 still the work horse of
>>many
>>>>airlines. One of the few jets that can land on a
>>>>gravel runway.
>>>
>>>Possibly answering my own question: high mounted
>>>engine intakes are less able to inhale debris
>(pebbles
>>>or small rocks) that would damage the turbine blades?
>>>
>>>Jon

More info on the 737 still being built

https://www.youtube.com/user/Boeing?v=jfSNj8HB_WI

Wex
>>
>
>There is a gravel kit option for the B737. See link
>below
>
> >href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravelkit">http://en
>.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravelkit

>
>wex
>>The engines on the 737 hang under the wings. If it
>>indeed is certified to use gravel runways there must
>>be features Boeing designed in to make it possible.
>>
>>Lew


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.