Author:
Javahead
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: 16:13:20 08/16/12 Thu
>>
>>>We've never seen Joel from the inside, and I have
>>>little desire to do so. Given his actions, he's very
>>>lucky Randy didn't follow through on the "bridge"
>>>threat. And it wouldn't have seemed any more than
>>>mildly excessive if he had.
>>
>>
>>the problem I always had with the bridge threat was,
>>depending on the size of the abutments, wouldn't it
>>put the long-term structural integrity of the concrete
>>at risk? While it's practical from a short-term
>>objective, it wouldn't look good for Clark
>>Construction for the long-term...
>
>
>Not if done right, they just put in extra reinforcing
>than is normally required. The extra strength makes up
>for Joel. Randy could even spread him about by cutting
>in up a bit.
I find the mental image of Randy using a machete or saw to dismember his brother-in-law . . . disturbing. As if Wes had been possessed by Steven King after a night of heavy drinking while watching "Psycho".
Not that it would be *undeserved*, mind you. But it would be hard to view Randy in quite the same way again. I'd be worrying about him giving the same treatment to the troublesome school inspector, rent-seeking union reps, perhaps helping Crystal dispose of Tanisha's jerk brother . . .
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
|