Click here for an easy and free way to help protect endangered habitat at The Rainforest Site! Non-profit ad by Voyager
VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tue, Jan 23 2007, 14:13:01 PST
Author: Anthony McIntyre-The Blanket
Subject: Derry debate
In reply to: DERRY JOURNAL 's message, "Derry anti-PSNI Meeting" on Mon, Jan 22 2007, 21:46:38 PST

Derry Debate







Anthony McIntyre • 21 January 2007

When I arrived and saw the main hall of Derry's Tower Hotel filled to overflowing, my first thought was that Sinn Fein had put the work in and packed the venue. Later reports of the attendance ranged from 400 to 600. A follow up thought questioned my earlier prediction that unlike previous events in Belfast and Toome Sinn Fein would not turn up for this debate. The party had formally announced its leadership's long made decision to back the British PSNI and would not want to go through what for it was the sham of discussing the issue in circumstances where it did not control the audience. It was ten or fifteen minutes into the debate before I realised that my prediction had in fact been right.

Trying to peer over the heads from the entrance, it was not until the second panellist, Gerry McGeough, had finished speaking that I realised that the body of the hall was a Sinn Fein free zone. Tony TC Catney from Belfast had been introduced to the audience by chair John Kelly as a former member of Sinn Fein and he opened the night's events. The crowd applauded politely as the former republican lifer gave a detailed submission in which he raised his objections to current Sinn Fein strategy and called on critics of the party's position to think much more seriously about the policing debate than heretofore.

On the panel alongside McGeough and Catney were Tony McPhilips of Republican Sinn Fein, the 32 County Sovereignty Movement's Francie Mackey and Eddie McGarrigle of the IRSP. McPhilips and McGeough had a clear advantage over the others in that they are accomplished public speakers. McGeough in particular knows how to push the buttons in a republican audience and he showed no dearth of dexterity in hitting them all at the right moment. Whether it was his dismissal of the Sinn Fein leadership as inept and bungling or his description of the RUC abuse of the body of Derry hunger striker, INLA volunteer Patsy O'Hara, each utterance prompted rapture.

Conversely, the remaining panellists delivered their talks in a rather flat manner. While such presentations might suit a more reflective academic audience the gathering at the Tower Hotel was not in the mood for reflection, preferring instead to have the emotions stoked and the instincts sated through a diet of republican rhetoric.

What I learned from the meeting was that the numbers of angry people are growing steadily. To see so many former prisoners there whom I had served time with was heartening. To a man they echoed the sentiment of sell out. There was no dissent from the crowd and general agreement from the panel when it was suggested from the floor that the Sinn Fein leadership is heavily infiltrated by MI5. Contribution after contribution from the standing room only crowd made reference to a sense of betrayal.

What I did not learn from the meeting was any outline for a way forward. True, Sinn Fein has no alternative to the administration of British rule and has accepted the British state's alternative to republicanism. Yet, republicans gathered in Derry showed little sign of developing the republican strategy they profess to hold. This gives Sinn Fein the advantage. One of the elements in the collapse of republicanism and it being replaced by a non-republican strategy, the peace process, was the inability of the Sinn Fein leadership to develop republicanism and shift it out of the political cul de sac in which it had long resided. Sinn Fein gave up the ghost, moved out of the cul de sac but in the process signed up to an internal solution. Those opposed to an internal settlement show no sign of escaping the political ghetto. Many seem content to stay there.

On the night, the panellist who must have gained more satisfaction than most was Francie Mackey. Eight years ago in the wake of the appalling Omagh bomb he would have been lucky to have an audience of two listen to him. Then he was pilloried and lambasted the length and breadth of Ireland. The leaders of the Enniskillen bombers with brazen duplicity turned up at Omagh to join in the frenzied assault. That no one ever alleged Mackey was involved with the bombing seemed not to matter. His membership of the 32CSM was enough to demonise him. While he never sought to defend the act the critics rarely differentiated between his position and the act of the bombers. In the face of unremitting hostility he faced press and critics alike, steadfastly refusing to walk away from the political perspective he believed in. Mackey's political views can be challenged but his courage stands unassailable. To admire him being applauded for his contribution by an audience so large was not to acknowledge in the slightest that physical force republicanism has any place in republican activism, but to recognise the durability and strength of character of the individual on the platform.

The absence of Sinn Fein from the debate gave it the sound of one hand clapping. It became a political rally rather than an informed exchange of views. Many of those who wanted to ask questions of Sinn Fein seemed incapable of reformulating their question so that positions could be teased out from the panel. It was an opportunity missed. The panel were hardly going to disagree on points of criticism thrown at the absent Sinn Fein from the floor. It became an echo chamber for the audience. There was also a disturbing touch of the evangelical about proceedings. At one point somebody apologised for having allowed Sinn Fein to lead him by the nose. No one seemed interested in challenging the panellists. Gerry McGeough for instance went unquestioned about views he holds that many republicans regard as anti-secular, misogynist, racist and reactionary. Elsewhere McGeough has vigorously contested such characterisation but the Tower Hotel event was the venue where the matter should have been discussed more thoroughly. McGeough is no shrinking violet and would not have wilted in the face of intelligent probing. As it was he was denied the opportunity to set the record straight and neither he nor the audience appeared to mind. His listeners seemed content to lift the roof as McGeough's powerful oratory glided into overdrive.

It would be a travesty if such a gathering of republicans were to remain indifferent to these concerns. The emotion of the evening should not have acted as a seamless garment that enveloped all before it. Unless threads are unpicked at such gatherings and republicans challenge each other the ability of these events to inform is limited.

Ironically Sinn Fein shaped the meeting without even having to turn up. The crowd was fixated with the party and expended its intellectual energy in highlighting its shortcomings. This may be an exercise that writers and critics can afford to pursue but for people ostensibly seeking to politically advance the republican project as a viable alternative to Sinn Fein, it was the 'opportunity to miss an opportunity'. A former republican prisoner from Downpatrick was alone in pointing it out and urged the hall to strategise rather than criticise.

On the way home to Belfast, pondering the night's events, I had mixed emotions. On the one hand, intense satisfaction that the power of isolation is diminishing. On the other, a feeling that Mr McGeough and colleagues had marched them up to the top of the hill … and back down seems the most likely destination.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.
The Voy.com User Agreement applies to all visitors.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.