Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>I agree with Stephen. Jesus, did I just say that ;) >All the bikes discribed by Steve D. were not really >performers in their day with the exception of the KZ >.....maybe? BUT! the VRRA needs to move forward faster >not slower. When a class pretty much dies out like the >P1 HVWT the club should introduce a P4 and with P2 >Hvwt almost pushing up daisys maybe y'all should be >looking at P5. I know all the old buggers are going to >be kicking and screaming but the bottom line is the >bottom line. If people want to keep the mentioned >classes as premier then #1 maybe they should support >them and #2 maybe they should lobby others to support >them. As was previously posted by myself and others >I/we have no interest in racing a P1 or likely a P2 >bike. However if the VRRA would step into the >twentieth century I would love to build a late 80s and >maybe early 90s bike to race. For all that suggest >these are not vintage try taking a F2 into Pro 600 and >see how vintage it really is. Want further proof look >at WERA P5-P7 and even the dinosours in ARHMA have >seen the light and introduced newer classes.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.
The Voy.com User Agreement applies to all visitors.