VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:27:10 07/27/06 Thu
Author: Steve in ATL
Subject: Re: i dont think so
In reply to: Jonathan 's message, "Re: i dont think so" on 11:23:28 07/27/06 Thu

>>Have you already decided that Landis is guilty?
>As I said: I think doping is what probably happened.
>So at the moment, yes, I think he is guilty of it.
>That's not to say I'm sure, but it's the best
>assessment I can make.
>I think you shouldn't insult people by calling them
>unthinking on one forum and preach something entirely
>different on another - it makes it look like you don't
>really support the rules you would try to enforce.

If you are open to the possibility that Landis is innocent (i.e., all this is moot if his B-sample passes) then you haven't convicted him on the basis of the A-sample only, have you? If you have, then that's an non-thinking attitude, which makes House's statement oxymoronic. Your application to any particular individual is your own demon.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2017 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.