VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:32:03 09/22/04 Wed
Author: z-dog
Subject: Re: Notice the silence from those who did the slaughtering...
In reply to: Lady Lurker 's message, "Re: Notice the silence from those who did the slaughtering..." on 05:02:09 09/22/04 Wed

>>Though in all fairness the jury is MOST DEFINITELY
>>still out on the Hamilton situation.
>
>You are contradicting yourself.

If it makes you feel better to say that, have at it. My commments were less about prentice than the host of whistle-blowers and their detractors on this board. Hope that's clear now.

>How can the jury
>still be out on Hamilton and yet it's definite that
>anyone was unfair to Prentice Steffen?
>
>If Steffen had/has any proof, he should make it
>available to all. Apparently he has no proof. So his
>memory as well as possible misinterpretation of what
>Tyler and Jemison may have been asking for are still
>issues. Steffen wasn't "slaughtered," not by a long
>shot. His comments were inflammatory short of proof
>backing up what he said.

Your opinion, your spin, your mantra. We've heard it a million times.

Every time a whistle-blower comes out, he/she is perfunctorally lambasted on this board. And every time, shortly after, a rider is caught doping using methods incredibly similar to those described. If you can't see that, not sure what to tell you. This could be said w/o the Hamilton situation, it's just old hat.

>Those of you so quick to want to lynch anyone and/or
>support the would-be lynchers including Walsh, Steffen
>etc. ought to consider this: Tyler's career could be
>over through no fault of his own.

That's obvious, and why I stated VERY CLEARLY that the jury is still out. This is the case in EVERY ONE of these cases where a specific rider is named. Reason number #5,392 why naming names is often avoided by "whistle-blowers".

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.