VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:53:16 09/22/04 Wed
Author: z-dog
Subject: Re: Notice the silence from those who did the slaughtering...
In reply to: Lady Lurker 's message, "Re: Notice the silence from those who did the slaughtering..." on 11:13:14 09/22/04 Wed

>>>How can the jury
>>>still be out on Hamilton and yet it's definite that
>>>anyone was unfair to Prentice Steffen?
>>>
>>>If Steffen had/has any proof, he should make it
>>>available to all. Apparently he has no proof. So
>his
>>>memory as well as possible misinterpretation of what
>>>Tyler and Jemison may have been asking for are still
>>>issues. Steffen wasn't "slaughtered," not by a long
>>>shot. His comments were inflammatory short of proof
>>>backing up what he said.
>>
>>Your opinion, your spin, your mantra. We've heard it a
>>million times.
>
>No, it's not mine. It is a part of American values,
>however. I realize not everyone shares those values
>and that is understandable. If you are an American,
>however, and you are of the lynch-mob mentality
>displayed by some here, then your problem is with your
>upbringing.
>
>>
>>Every time a whistle-blower comes out, he/she is
>>perfunctorally lambasted on this board. And every
>>time, shortly after, a rider is caught doping using
>>methods incredibly similar to those described. If you
>>can't see that, not sure what to tell you. This could
>>be said w/o the Hamilton situation, it's just old hat.
>
>You missed the point as usual. You are already
>glorifying people like Steffen by calling him a
>whistle-blower. When I think of whistle-blower, I
>think of the courageous employees in companies like
>Enron who, at great personal risk to themselves, do
>what they think is right and stick it to the
>criminals. That is not the case with Steffen. He
>throws out some bait to the David Walshes and Z-dogs
>of the world, without providing any proof, and the
>Walshes and Z-dogs take it from there because they
>don't require any proof.
>
>Your logic is hilarious, z-dog. If someone has
>correctly pointed out that blood doping exists, then
>therefore Tyler Hamilton must be a blood doper.
>That's rich.
>
>>
>>>Those of you so quick to want to lynch anyone and/or
>>>support the would-be lynchers including Walsh,
>Steffen
>>>etc. ought to consider this: Tyler's career could be
>>>over through no fault of his own.
>>
>>That's obvious, and why I stated VERY CLEARLY that the
>>jury is still out. This is the case in EVERY ONE of
>>these cases where a specific rider is named. Reason
>>number #5,392 why naming names is often avoided by
>>"whistle-blowers".
>
>That's why I said you contradicted yourself and you
>made a snide remark about that, then go on to
>contradict yourself with gusto.
>
>Again, there is nothing in common between your
>whistle-blower heroes in cycling and true
>whistleblowers elsewhere truly fighting the good fight.


Do your posts make sense to you? I wouldn't know where to begin to responsd to this insanity. Have a nice day.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.