Click here for an easy and free way to help protect endangered habitat at The Rainforest Site! Non-profit ad by Voyager
VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:58:19 09/22/04 Wed
Author: Abundance Guy
Subject: Re: Not really
In reply to: FondriestFan 's message, "Not really" on 12:41:49 09/22/04 Wed

>Not at all. Early astronomers saw the movements of
>the planets then sought to develop theories to explain
>them. Ergo, practice before theory. A theory is not
>necessarily an idea. A theory can be an attempt to
>explain logically a behavior or practice that exist a
>priori.
>
>Just my two cents.
>
>
>
>>>>
>>>>I am no doctor, but it boggles the mind how far
>ahead
>>>>the cheaters seem to be ahead of the medical
>>>>profession.
>>>
>>>yes boggling, but then again theory will ALWAYS
>follow
>>>practice.
>>
>>Huh? How can theory ever follow practice? You must
>>come up with ideas before you can act on them.

No wonder we misunderstand one another. By "practice" I assumed you meant the actions of man (as in doping). I guess that it could be argued that the planets are practicing their orbits, but the terminology seems strange. By the same token it's odd that we trust doctors who are only practicing medicine. I wish I could find one who has more confidence in his abilities than that.

By the way, I've noticed recently that Uranus appears to be cheating. Maybe WADA can develop a test for that.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Re: Not really -- NSF, 13:47:15 09/22/04 Wed
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.