VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]78 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:53:58 09/22/04 Wed
Author: jeff
Subject: i can't argue because Tyler did not do it.
In reply to: info 's message, "Re: Someone please argue the case for homologous transfusions" on 18:18:31 09/22/04 Wed

i can't come up with another explanation simply because Tyler did not do it. why don't you all wait for more evidence to come in instead of blasting off that he DID do it.

i hope all these nay sayers choke on their own words when this is all settled.

jeff


>Anyone have better medical knowledge that can argue
>the case of why he would have chosen this method.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.