Create a New Forum Owner Login Contribute & Create Your Member account VoyUser Login (see contribute) VoyForums Directory/Categories No-ads: Completely remove ads from your forum VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News Help Desk VoyForums Exchange FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions Search VoyForums
Oklahoma Disaster Relief American Red Cross Together, we can save a life See Kare11.com's page for more ways to contribute. VoyForums Notice -- Quick Contributions: Donate $10 to the Red Cross: Text the word REDCROSS to 90999 Donate $10 to the Salvation Army: Text the word STORM to 80888 * The charge will appear on your cellphone bill.

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Not up to standard? I think you should preface this by saying that this is just your opinion - and and UNFORMED one at that.....Whilst the 2008 gil did not place -neither did 2007 or 2004 . The 2009 winner (who apparently dissapoint you) (Lena Ma) placed SECOND HIGHEST at MW in Canadian Pagenant history - So if your OPINION is that the winners were not beautiful, then that is not the fault of the organizer, it was the judges choice, and in 2008 Jimmy Steel and Connie Fitzpatrick WERE judges as, and Connie was a judge in 2009 (which is unethical in my opinion) - And as far as I know in 2003 (the first for that org) MWC under that management - only had 6 contestants (the winner eventually went on the place 1st RU at MW) Author: Zinger [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 13:04:34 05/20/11 Fri In reply to: JF 's message, "The quality of the winners were disappointing for me in 2008 and 2009. After years of selecting gorgeous gals, we ended up with these 2 winners in 2008 and 2009, clearly not at the same level of the previous winners. Thats only my personal opinion though" on 11:57:57 05/20/11 Fri [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date I clearly stated that this was my opinion from the very beginning. Yes, it was maybe the judges fault, but still, they got accepted as candidates by the organization. Also, I didn't imply that all the girls placed, I just said that I found them to be all gorgeous from 2003-2007, and then not up to international standards (again, thats my personal opinion). (NT) JF 17:51:23 05/21/11 Sat OK - well then your statement is hogwash - with no basis whatesover. Because if we go by the MW standard - since Lena Ma (2009) placed higher than all of them except 2003. (NT) -- Zinger, 12:39:04 05/22/11 Sun