Click here for an easy and free way to help feed the hungry at The Hunger Site! Non-profit ad by Voyager
VoyForums
Oklahoma Disaster Relief










American Red Cross
Together, we can save a life


See Kare11.com's page for more ways to contribute.

VoyForums Notice -- Quick Contributions:
Donate $10 to the Red Cross: Text the word REDCROSS to 90999
Donate $10 to the Salvation Army: Text the word STORM to 80888
* The charge will appear on your cellphone bill.


VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]678910 ]
Subject: I do agree. There is a difference when it comes to taking nude pictures to be more editorial than ... well, you know what. Not because a model's top is off doesn't make them a poor role model for girls around the world. It's 2008--it's about time women became more empowered with what they can do with their bodies as long as it fosters self-respect and free will. (And world peace. LOL)


Author:
Mike D
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 19:41:23 12/09/08 Tue
In reply to: Cristina 's message, "I Dont Know If This Was Brought Up But Wasnt This Half Naked Girl In The Miss Universe Canada GTA Preliminaries? http://www.elitemodel.com/details.aspx?navbtn=1&city=TO&indx=1&subid=4676&mainsubid=4676&io=&from=" on 21:42:59 12/08/08 Mon


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Mike, I agree with your statement about women being more empowered, but I don't think showing one's tits necessarily achieves that goal. I'd like my Canadian representative, to have a modicum of class (as well as be Canadian), instead of some recent immigrant stripper/model. (NT)Brent13:06:49 12/10/08 Wed



Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.