>
VoyForums

Fri, Jan 08, 05:17:14amVoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:40:21 10/11/08 Sat
Author: shellb
Subject: i forgot how much I liked that one. :-) I wonder if/how that conversation will go now...
In reply to: Vicki 's message, "You can copy and paste the addy or I put a link in here for it>>>>>>>>>>>>>" on 13:24:56 10/11/08 Sat


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> [> excerpt -- Lady Rebecca (OMG!!!), 17:09:31 10/11/08 Sat

this is OMG! WOW, but OUCH! NO! Clarie canna ever marry LJ no matter! LJ is wonderful, but ouch never betray Jamie. It sounds like it could be used in Echo.. oh but no,, please never such a terror! I'd no live through it!
WOW what an adrenaline rush!

[Edit]










[> [> [> [> I agree with you. Lady Rebecca. Never liked the idea of Claire marrying LJG (I read this excerpt when it originally came out )-just seemed to wierd for me. LJG raising Jamie's son, then married to his "widow"? I do believe that DG has said she had forgotten all about it-it was written so long ago & she didn't even know where it was. I would be disappointed if this were put in. After 20 years of separation, how in the world are Jmaie & Claire separated again (haven't they been through enough already??)? If I were Claire, I'd never let him out of my sight & stick to him like glue! -- Rollaine, 13:17:33 10/12/08 Sun


[Edit]





[> [> [> [> [> It makes me laugh - if that excerpt is included in coming books - because Jamie, when he first hears of it - will have to wonder if the marriage was consummated - remember how John told him that he didn't have to enjoy it to perform the act. hahahahaha -- GiGi, 18:17:32 10/13/08 Mon


[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> [> I would find that disheartening. Not because LJG is gay-that has absolutely nothing to do with how I feel about him. I think that Claire, even if this excerpt is included (DG said she didn't even remember it!), would remain faithful to Jamie at this point even if she assumes he is dead and marry LJG in name only. How could she be with another man after Jamie and thier "speical bond & love"? I would at that point seriously be angry with Claire! In fact the reason she married him is for her protection. It just seems a littel to wierd and convenient for my taste-but that's JMHO. -- Rollaine, 13:42:34 10/14/08 Tue


[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> If I am correct, DG posted this scenario over a couple years. First, with John coming to propose. 2nd with John's mother, the Dowager, finding Jamie and Claire together in John's house and has them arrested And the 3rd part - Jamie and Claire in that stable jail and Willie coming to rscue Claire and Claire telling him they must also take Jamie and telling Willie just why - that Jamie is his real father. If I am not mistaken - they were 3 distinct postings, over a period of time. Why would DG spend so much time writing these scenes and developing the story and then NOT use them. -- GiGi, 14:02:26 10/14/08 Tue


[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Yes, I read them all, and was never fond of the storyline. From what I read, she writes in pieces. They were all originally on her website and have since been taken down. According to what she said on compuserve, she had totaly forgotten about them and didn't even remember where they were. Perhaps the story is shaping up in a different way than this plotline. Don't know why they were discarded, but for me, I hope the story goes in a different direction. JMHO. -- Rollaine, 14:46:48 10/14/08 Tue


[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Rollaine - I ceratinly hope this story line is not used, also. But what confuses me - is that DG says that the characters "TALK" to her. Well if they "TOLD" her these 3 scenes - then they DID happen - but she will just not include them in the books?????? -- GiGi, 15:00:20 10/14/08 Tue


[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> My guess is that she wrote them so long ago that the story has taken on a new shape. When I first read those scenes, I thought, what would make Jamie go to Scotland and leave Claire behind??? My next thought was that maybe Bree was pregnant & needed her. But now they are back in the future, so perhaps there is no reason Claire would have to let Jamie go without her. Like I said, after all those years apart-I'd be at his side like glue!!! Maybe DG kind of thought the same thing-seemed strange after all they have been through that they would willingly separate for that long. -- Rollaine, 15:28:14 10/14/08 Tue


[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Rollaine - I believe that DG has said that Claire goes back to Scotland with Jamie. -- GiGi, 18:43:21 10/14/08 Tue


[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Yes, I think so, too. I just couldn't imagine Claire leaving Jamie at this point for any reason!!! -- Rollaine, 20:11:12 10/14/08 Tue


[Edit]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> I think so too. I think there was a excerpt about Claire asking Jamie is they needed to write to Jenny to tell her they were coming (Ian, Rollo, Claire & Jamie), and he said something about it not being necessary. -- Mitzi, 22:28:31 10/14/08 Tue


[Edit]






[> [> [> [> Oh, but that is the reason for having the gay friend! Someone she can marry, but not really be married to! I think it is very clever!!! -- Lady JenF, 17:08:40 10/12/08 Sun


[Edit]

















Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.