VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:43:32 04/07/15 Tue
Author: Lady-Jane
Subject: Herself gets to see all the dailies, and this is what she had to say about the river/Laoghaire scene. CLICKIT HERE . It explains a LOT!
In reply to: Shads 's message, "Nah, he couldn't do that. Sure, it would have made sense, but at this point in the tale Jamie is pretty naive and never deliberately cruel. Besides, it would abrogate motivation for a lot of Logwart's later activities. It makes her less of a horrible person if she honestly believes that Jamie was forced to marry Claire. And I think Laoghaire continues to believe he's carrying a candle for herself until she shares his bed and overhears his dreams years and years later. Maybe she doesn't understand what love is, so she can't recognize it when she sees it. And remember, she's only 16 at this point." on 19:56:19 04/05/15 Sun


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> [> That does clear it up a bit - thank you for the link. I'm with Diana, the missing wee bit of dialog between J & L makes a difference. But essentially, we need to be able to see L as a spurned and dissappointed lover. Yes, she's 16 but at the time she could have already been married with children. She's an adult. -- kgp, 08:31:37 04/08/15 Wed


[ Edit | View ]








[ Contact Forum Admin ]




Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.