VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04:13:29 06/11/04 Fri
Author: pee'tophia
Subject: Re: ....
In reply to: ben 's message, "...." on 08:17:36 06/04/04 Fri

>man you guys are UGLY

i disagree, but then beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
i'd say you'd be better off looking for bands that you don't find atractive and/or just don't even think about how people look when it comes to music, then you might actually find music that has substance rather than just style. my point being good looks are pretty irrelevant when a band is good and great, look at the pixies and the very unwashed lightning bolt for instance (i could name countless other great bands with a classically odd image)
all that and i thought that was a very rude comment, shame on you.
pete

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.