Can we cut to the chase here, PLEASE? -- My HAVE FUN Forum & Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject:

Can we cut to the chase here, PLEASE?

Author:
Mike R.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:45:10 01/19/03 Sun
In reply to: World Against Terror (WAT) 's message, "War on Terrorism" on 17:35:21 12/30/02 Mon

A QUOTE: " Secretary of State Colin Powell said on CNN's "Late Edition."

"If you say you're clean, then come clean. Time is running out. We can't keep hunting and pecking and trying to see if we can find something."
.......

Do we really think that that�s what the inspectors are doing? Why is it that a few weeks ago on another news show, he was stating that we have irrefutable evidence that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction? Share that information with the inspectors, lets find it and either force Saddam to comply, or get this darn war started. If we really don�t have the evidence that the Secretary talked about, then come clean with the whole deal. I�m getting a little confused at some of the things I�m seeing in the news these days. Everyone seems to be sidestepping issues and retracting statements. Is this the fault of the staffers that actually stated this rhetoric, or the media that reports it?

A QUOTE: Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Sunday that exile for Saddam Hussein and other members of the Iraqi leadership would be a "fair trade" to avoid a military conflict.
........

That would solve some problems now wouldn�t it?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Why is Bush So Insistant With Iraq?	Matt	16:50:11 01/24/03 Fri

Re: Why is Bush So Insistant With Iraq?	pet	17:50:10 01/27/03 Mon