Nancy Brookbank -- WLouisHennessy.com

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:30:58 09/28/02 Sat
Author: Elaine
Author Host/IP: 1Cust153.tnt1.waldorf.md.da.uu.net / 67.201.24.153
Subject:

Nancy Brookbank
In reply to: W. Louis Hennessy 's message, "Reply to Elaine" on 15:37:15 09/27/02 Fri

I believe that DNA played a major role in proving that these people were innocent. DNA is not a factor in this case! Do you know what DNA is? O.J. Simpson says he is innocent too.
What greater injustice can you see when someone in your position is acting anti-sypathetic to the little baby who Nancy Brookbank was found guilty of abusing. Do you realize that she took his life that day and that the neurosurgeon who operated on him and saved his life, said that he was injured while in her care! There isn't any DNA out there that can change his testimony or the verdict. Nancy Brookbank didn't get the death penalty, Jack Sprague did!!!!!!!!!!!!! She got 5 lousy years and she should serve it with a little bit of humility and shame. Little Jack Sprague received life in prison; imprisoned in his mind and body.
She knows what she did to him and God will never forgive her for it!
Your message IS CLEAR! You support a convicted child abuser and you will lose votes because of it. I hope all 700 of them are old enough to vote.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Reply to Elaine -- W. Louis Hennessy, 17:09:46 09/29/02 Sun (cache-mtc-ac09.proxy.aol.com/64.12.96.78)

You are correct DNA did play a role in clearing some of the people I mentioned but in many cases it was just good footwork and investigative skill, in many cases by those outside law enforcement.

As I mentioned before I symphatize with the victim in this matter. Again, I don't have an opinion about guilt or innocence on the part of Nancy Brookbank. Only that she maintains her innocence and if she believes she is innocent, she should continue to fight to prove her innocence.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]