VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]
Subject: Re: 以成績劃分也有強中弱,這個不算是問題。


Author:

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 08:18:48 08/07/04 Sat
In reply to: 阿信Faith 's message, "Re: 以成績劃分也有強中弱,這個不算是問題。" on 23:02:06 08/05/04 Thu

以成績分組和以智能分組的分別:

一) 成績相對地較客觀,如果用多元智能來分,不知現在是否已有有信度和效度的測試來分組?

二) 學生的學習模式、學習心志和已有基礎決定了學習成果,所以,學習模式只是影響學習的其中一個元素。假設我們能將不同智能學生分組,每組自有不同基礎和不同心志的學生,是否要再分下去?如果以成績分組,起碼解決學習心志和已有基礎這兩個問題,如果肯在成績差的一組來配以多元化教學,效果會較好。

三) 就算能準確地將學生以各自擅長的學習模式分組,教師能否對於同一課題,創出這七種教學方式?就算可以,又怎達到相同的教學效果?是否每一課題或每一科都可以用不同學習模式去處理?

我的結論是,先以成績分組,如有資源,再以多個(不能太多太細分)學習模式來教或分開教。如果先以智能來分,我覺得有點是倒轉了分組的次序。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.