Re: SCOTUS ruled as I expected -- The Rosewater Foundation, Rosewater, Indiana

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:57:14 08/08/12 Wed
Author: MaryAnne
Subject: Re: SCOTUS ruled as I expected
In reply to: Greg 's message, "Re: SCOTUS ruled as I expected" on 16:37:09 07/27/12 Fri

Hope all is well with all of you. Shirley seems to be coming along fine.When are you coming home,Paul? Good luck on your work.

Greg,the Health Care bill was a plan from the Heritage Foundation. Republicans were for it until it became Obama's plan.

I am not crazy about it,because I would like to see a Health Care plan like the rest of the civilized world has so people would be taken care of and not go broke if they become ill.

But,it is a start and so far many things are working well.
The wellness plan is doing just fine for the Insurance companies.They have adjusted and are working to keep people well,instead of letting them become so sick they almost die before they get care.

For all the talk of it killing Medicare Advantage they are now working to keep people healthy and doing just fine.

>>Given that every single suggestion for "less
>>intrusive" government over the last 30 years would
>>require the taxpayer to be mandated to buy something,
>>whether it be a pension or whatever, and that most of
>>these suggestions came from the right, including
>>several from standing members of the court, it was
>>highly unlikely to the point of impossible that they'd
>>rule against the healthcare act. Don't be surprised
>>when there's a host of "mandate to buy" pensions,
>>schooling, child whatever and so forth coming from the
>>Republican side in the next Congress.
>
>
>Gonna have to ask..........what are you talking about?
> I haven't seen a single thing come from the right
>that said that you had to purchase something, whether
>you wanted it, needed, or not. You don't even have to
>get Medicare Part D if you don't care to.
>
>Well, at least you used to not have to, now I
>suppose.....................

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]