| Subject: Re: Seducers |
Author:
brian
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 15:53:57 06/16/04 Wed
In reply to:
BoyScoutKevin
's message, "Re: Seducers" on 08:24:36 06/14/04 Mon
are you really allowed to be that racially offensive- how can you say that white is sexy and black is not- where does it say that? who tells you that? and I dont know what country YOU are from but Al Pacino and Marlon are Italian ie Meditteranean- and therefore not "white" in any sense- I doubt they would call themselves that. Oh I am very disappointed.>>>
I would say blair underwood- IS sexy- and will smith
>>IS sexy an halle berry IS sexy- and they are all
>>non-white. What about Salma Hayek? Antonio Banderas?
>>Al Pacino? Marlon Brando? Ray Liotta? COME ON!
>>:)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Some 43 seducers mentioned. Well, I guess my
>>>heterosexuality is safe for another year. I found
>none
>>>of them particularly sexy.
>>>
>>>They did get one thing totally wrong, which made me
>>>question the whole special. They said the vampire was
>>>not sexy. (Our Amanda in "Lair of the White Worm"
>>>anyone?) The vampire has been sexy since Bela Lugosi
>>>was wowing the women in the audience with his
>>>portrayal of Dracula in the stage version of
>>"Dracula."
>>>
>>>Actually, someone needs to do a television special
>>>about sex in horror films. If it's been shown in a
>>>film, it's probably been shown in a horror film
>first.
>>>
>>>They did get one thing right. James Bond makes any
>>>actor sexy. Pierce Brosnan, Sean Commery, Roger
>Moore,
>>>and even Timoty Dalton, who they did not mention.
>>>Unfortunately, the only American actor to play James
>>>Bond is Ed Nelson in a television version of "Casino
>>>Royale."
>>>
>>>Which is one more thing American men have to worry
>>>about. While only 16% of the seductresses were
>>>foreigners, more then twice that number of seducers
>>>were foreigners.
>>>
>>>White is sexy. Black is not. Again while 16% if the
>>>seductresses were minorities, less then one third of
>>>that number of seducers were.
>>>
>>>Some two dozen films. If these are chick flicks, it
>is
>>>surprising how few of them I have seen and liked.
>>>Actually, the only one was "The King and I."
>>>
>>>Actually, the program could have been longer. Most of
>>>the program was given over to seducers of today. The
>>>up and coming seducers of tomorrow got less then five
>>>minutes, and that included the credits, and the
>>>seducers of yesterday got even less time then that.
>>
>>First of all, I was only expressing my opinion of the
>opinions expressed in the special.
>
>I do not know what country you are from, but, here in
>the U.S., Al Pacino, Marlon Brando, and Ray Liotta
>would be considered to be white. Will Smith, Halle
>Berry, Antonio Banderas, and Selma Hayek would, of
>course, be considered a member of a racial minority,
>which here in the U.S. would consist of Asians,
>blacks, Latinos, Native Americans, and Pacific
>Islanders. These racial minorities make up some 20% of
>the total population of the U.S. at large. 20% of the
>women. 20% of the men. While the 16% of the actresses
>portrayed on the special were minorities, or close to
>the minority population at large. Only 5% of the
>actors portrayed on the special were minorities, or a
>woeful undercount of the minority population at large.
>Thus, I hold to my opinion that the special was saying
>that white was sexy, and non-white was not, especially
>when it comes to male minority actors.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 