I'll bake a cake!!! -- Understanding thru talking

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:52:24 07/11/03 Fri
Author: Bundt Cake Blower/Cornholer
Subject: I'll bake a cake!!!
In reply to: Intelligence Provider 's message, "Tonight is the First Anniversary" on 08:43:17 07/08/03 Tue

AND PUT A STICK OF DYNOMITE IN THE MIDDLE AND SIT THERE TRYING TO BLOW IT OUT UNTIL IT BLOWS ME UP!!!!!!

>>>>>>....how is it that I get the strong feeling that
>>>>>>something or somebody - or perhaps both - on this
>>>>>>board has been, er,... "Phuckianed up"... to coin
>a
>>>>>>phrase???
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
>Tonight is the First Anniversary of "The Incident" -
>the one that demonstrated conclusively to The Suspect
>that the plan had failed....miserabley.
>
>
>
>
>>>>>It seems genuinely difficult to understand....
>>>>>.....how The Suspect and his mental state could
>have
>>>>>been so badly screwed up by The Incident. After
>all,
>>>>>there was only an arrest and a raid, and no charges
>>>>>resulted - The Suspect simply could not be charged
>>>>>with anything, nor did any jail term or fines
>ensue.
>>>>>
>>>>>An overreaction to "The Incident", it would seem -
>>>>>perhaps exaggerated.
>>>>>
>>>>>But real reason for The Suspect's motivational
>>>>>collapse was that "The Suspect" had seen that the
>>>>>plan - or what he thought was the plan - had
>>>>>failed.....that "Adult Material" does not arouse
>the
>>>>>suspicions that it should have - the suspicion that
>>>>>consumers of such Adult Material might tend to
>>>>>gravitate downwards. If the porno actor is aged 18
>>>>>plus one day.....this arouses no a wisp of
>>>>>suspicion.....none whatever.
>>>>
>>>>The term "Adult" does not mean the exact same age to
>>>>all Child Advocates.
>>>>
>>>>How can one ever be really sure that "Adult
>Material"
>>>>is not the depiction of an actual rape?
>>>>
>>>>What are the motivations of people who enjoy viewing
>>>>such material, which could plausibly be the
>>depictions
>>>>of rape?
>>>>If they enjoy "Adult Material" for the purpose of
>>>>imagining that what is going on is a rape, then this
>>>>gives probable cause for a policeman to believe that
>>>>such people would enjoy what they knew full well to
>>be
>>>>depictions of actual rape.
>>>
>>>It seems likely that much Adult Material does not
>>>contain visual repesentations of actual rapes.
>>>So what is your point?
>>
>>It seems likely that the material is highly ambiguous,
>>actually.
>>
>>You can't be seriously suggesting that someone could
>>take pleasure in what might easily be a
>>thinly-disguised rape.
>>Such people obviously have rapist-like tendencies.
>>
>>Even if women look like they are enjoying it, they
>>might be drugged in actuality.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>This board has many fine aspects about it, not
>>>>>least
>>>>>>>>>the high level of freedom of speech.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>However, many posters seem to promote and
>>>>idealize
>>>>>>>>>fornication and pornography, which is totally
>>>>>>>>>inappropriate.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Indeed, the enthusiastic endorsement and
>approval
>>>>of
>>>>>>>>"adult porn" by many Child Advocates, and it's
>>>>>>alleged
>>>>>>>>"social acceptability" and the resulting
>>>>>>>>politically-correct dichotomy was a major
>>>>>>contributory
>>>>>>>>factor in the problems encountered by The
>>Suspect,
>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>the resultant witch-hunt.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Porn is always porn, it's just that some of it
>is
>>>>>>>>worse than others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Seems like there's something missing from your
>>>>>>nick....

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: I'll bake a cake!!! -- Cure-eee-us, 13:38:20 07/11/03 Fri