Re: Publicly Promoting hatred towards an identifiable group -- Understanding thru talking

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:56:58 11/26/03 Wed
Author: Coffe Cornholer
Subject:

Re: Publicly Promoting hatred towards an identifiable group
In reply to: Drumstick Diddler 's message, "Re: Publicly Promoting hatred towards an identifiable group" on 02:26:45 11/24/03 Mon

>>>...group
>>>
>>>I read in the paper that a 70 year old Indian (the
>red
>>>skin ones) publicly opined that the Jews deserved to
>>>die in the holocaust.
>>>
>>>Hmm a member of a favoured group dissing another
>>>protected group. Here is my question; Do you think if
>>>someone publicly said "Why, those recalcitrant
>>>Germans, *could* have done something about that nasty
>>>anti-semite, Adolph What's his name. They didn't and
>>>consequently, deserved to have their cities turned
>>>into rubble and have their citizens flung through the
>>>air like rag dolls".
>>>
>>>Maybe we should contact Michael Jackson's lawyer. He
>>>obviously has to be one sly cat!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>>What's up with all this rag talk? Bitches bleed. So
>>>what?
>>
>>It's better than having rag dolls turned to rubble and
>>their civilians turned into cities!!!
>
>OR BLEEDING RAG DOLLS BITCHING ABOUT CIVILIANS IN
>CITIES CONTACTING MICHAEL JACKSON!!!!

I HEARD THAT ALL THESE UNNECESSARY MISCARRIAGES WERE BEING OPPOSED BY A CERTAIN COMPANY. YUP YOU GUESSED IT, kIMBERLY CLARK AND KOTES!! TALK ABOUT BLOOD MONEY!!!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

oOPS i MEANT KOTEX!!!!! nt -- cOFFEE cORNHOLER, 11:58:12 11/26/03 Wed
- Re: oOPS i MEANT KOTEX!!!!! nt -- Chicken Cobbler aka Fruit Forceper, 11:41:05 12/01/03 Mon
  - Re: oOPS i MEANT KOTEX!!!!! nt -- Muffin Molester, 02:44:46 07/14/04 Wed