A brocade of hickey --

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:03:39 07/27/07 Fri
Author: vit
Subject: A brocade of hickey

Are there any tangible physical matters that would be more intimate in this material world, or rather, more showy in demonstrating publicly of such intimacy, than a brocade of hickey? This unique technique of human being conveys more than a peculiar behavior between two persons, whether they are deeply in love or other is definitely not to be gossiped here, since it is better to rely on paparazzi to finish their assignment, but also it is so difficult to explicit the intimate structure of matter.

The intention, thus trying to portray this complexity with monotonous words by using a posteriori, draws only for a preliminary grasp here; further study in trying to fathom this imbroglio, especially to some novice or doomed greenhorn, due to being without examination or analysis, should well acquaint with a priori.

The doctrine of whether an observable brocade of hickey is delivering pleasure to the sense, a philosophical contemplation in history could be applied by Plato��s Form. A Form is not a Soul or vice versa. Thus seeing or doing in a Form is needless to say not the identicalness with a Soul. Seeing without a Soul would result a wanton destruction; while doing without a Soul would prompt psychic blindness. The utilitarian considers the aim of action should be the largest possible balance of pleasure; therefore the answer should be positive. If the stoic happens to argue that the answer is only plausible, ask the moron to suckle, forgetting the pleasure in drinking milk should be deemed as the initiate decay of human moral.

Since Anton Chekhov said: everything that happens in life is necessary and nothing is contingent! Thus leaves no ground to impugn. Both romantic and pragmatist would no doubt believe themselves imbued with love. A face seemed anointed with watery yellow grease would agree to that status at least for the imminent momentum.

It is going to far wide guess a brocade of hickey could be omnipresent, because it would be indecent and even lascivious to feign seeing through other��s apparare, unless you are going to run for presidency of US. Since there has one so famous for his day dreaming fantasy and it wouldn��t be surprise that the successor mimics his path. So, how one picks among secretaries shouldn��t be a hard job! To swallow an easy pie is another matter. The recent one is simply too enthusiastic over looking by spotting something as huge as nuclear weapon which is inexistent in other country.

It would be so hard, in fact with a very skillful hand, to define and or to finish the job in explaining the full scale of what really is a brocade of hickey. Our beloved analytic philosopher and poet, Hoi-pang, might be the ultimate person could take a crack at riddling this phenomenon, because if he even would term an apple which Adam, the scapegoat, only ate it, why couldn��t he evade such a miserable qualm that Eve had been haunting for thousands of year.

Alas, why am I not going to have one?

Don��t pity me, well, where is yours?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]