Re: PDF Explorer beta 1.5 dissapears from screen -- PDF Explorer & PDF-ShellTools

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

Subject:

Re: PDF Explorer beta 1.5 dissapears from screen

Author:
RTT

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:33:55 12/06/05 Tue
In reply to: Ricardo 's message, "Re: PDF Explorer beta 1.5 dissapears from screen" on 04:05:19 12/06/05 Tue

Build 46 online tomorrow. And yes you are right, I need to reformulate the mechanism to force users, using the freeware version, to update to last beta

>Ok, I've seen other forum messages and I appear no to
>be the only one with this prob. So it's a question of
>updating the program to the next build (46 in this
>case) right? But when is it due?
>
>The only thing is, after automatically exiting, when I
>try to re-run it PDF-Explorer dosen't appear... as if
>I didn't clicked on it. It just doesn't show any
>message. If all I'm experiencing is related to an
>Update necessity, PDF-Explorer could display an
>warning message, saying why it couldn't start. Ok,
>maybe I'm not that INFO smart, but many of us aren't,
>and it could save both you and us a lot of blah blah.
>
>However, if there may be other reasons for this,
>please comment.
>
>Thanks again.
>
>Ricardo

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]