VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:22:41 10/10/02 Thu
Author: theo
Author Host/IP: cache-dp01.proxy.aol.com / 205.188.209.101
Subject: Re: Good God II
In reply to: Mock 's message, "Re: Good God II" on 08:03:18 10/10/02 Thu

Hey, Priest and Gannon were legitimate pickups--everyone knew they'd produce. Getting around 50 points from one DB, however, is the definition of a glitch.

That being said, I think we can all agree it'll be fun to watch The Geeks crash and burn this week. I suggest, though, that lay off Mike for a while and pretend like we still consider him a factor so as to maximize his desperation trades, each of which will garner us another buck at season's end.

>That is an interesting comment coming from someone who
>gets 30% of his points from Priest Holmes every week.
>You are worse than D.J. was with Marshall last year.
>If Priest goes down, which I believe he already does
>on his boyfriend every night, you are totally screwed.
>Gannon is too crusty to carry your entire team on his
>shoulders. And if I remember right, I got jack shit
>from my defense the week that I soundly defeated Gang
>Green. But I do agree: Daunte's Geek is headed for
>disaster, starting with a drubbing by Franks 'n Beans
>this week.
>
>
>
>>Hey Mike--For someone who's banned his team from the
>>media, you're still doing a lot of yammering. Sorry,
>>but I'm gonna need to see proof of purchase on the
>>guranteed win. BTW, you better be bringing some
>>breadcrumbs with you, because you are seriously in the
>>running back woods. Don't let the old lady in the
>>gingerbread house stuff you into her oven (although I
>>can certainly understand that you might want to put
>>your head in an oven given your running back
>>situation).
>>
>>Oh, and Mock--glad to see you've joined the
>>ever-growing club of folks who have stomped the shit
>>out of Daunte's Geek; just know that if you're
>>counting on 25% of your points coming from defensive
>>glitchiness every week, it's going to be a long
>>season.
>>
>>>I hate to even post this, but Mike's running backs
>>>suck cock!!! Will Antowain make a return appearance?
>>>Can Warrick Dunn handle the responsibilities of being
>>>a team's #1 back? Will Mike have a running back in
>>>double figures this week? These questions will be
>>>answered on the next episode of "Lost in the Woods:
>>>The Daunte's Peak Running Back Story". Alternate
>>>title: "When Shitty Running Backs Attack - and Score
>>>Five Points". And KGB still rules!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.