| Subject: Re: No further thoughts |
Author:
Ari
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 10:50:23 07/09/03 Wed
In reply to:
Lika
's message, "Re: No further thoughts" on 09:49:38 07/09/03 Wed
>People have got to stop giving sarcasm a bad rep.
>Used in good measured dose, it gives the correct
>amount of edge to a point.
Really? Just like you thought your post was an excellent response to Marina and not out of place in any way, I think this one was perfectly justified. In fact, I thought it was hilarious.
>Anyways, I don't get where you got pretentious from.
The sarcastic and condescending tone? The name-calling? Or perhaps the utter innanity or her uncalled-for response? Take a look- it's all there.
She is probably the most unbiased, honest
>person here.
According to the Agent, I'M one of the most unbiased people here. I doubt that's your opinion, though- just as this one isn't MINE. Sats' is about as unbiased as Charleton Heston at a gun control conference, the way I see things. Have a look at the last paragraph of her 'MIA' response for evidence.
>The only reason why I haven't
>rip anyone apart here with my famous fury is because I
>decided to do the mature thing and go to my drawer and
>bite on metal pieces until my cheeks hurt (though if
>anyone picks on Satsuki-chan or any of my friends here
>for any inane reasons, I will start going
>Bigwig on you). But that temper does not equal
>arrogance or elitism.
Or because you have to admit Marina has a good point. And Satsuki was shamelessly mocking her. Take 'now if you aren't an arrogant little nitpick yourself' for example. What, are you allowed to defend your friends if they're picked on and not me? I hardly find that fair. I hardly find that surprising, true, but the hypocrisy around here isn't usually THAT blatant.
>That was much long ago than this, and people were
>criticising her points or how her points appear in the
>post, not picking on grammar and spelling.
Would you like me to drag out the posts in which people DID criticize exactly those things, or would you rather save a tiny bit of face?
>Picking on Satsuki-chan for her timing is childish and
>ridiculous.
Is it now? What about her picking on Marina for equally stupid things? Alas, yet again, everyone here fails to understand irony.
>First of all because her timing isn't
>that off at all as I mentioned up there, and secondly,
>it doesn't invalidate anything she said.
'Anything she said'? Would that be the sarcasm or the name-calling that isn't being invalidated? Because there certainly weren't any points worth considering or debating in that reply- I simply responded in kind.
>Remember what I said about sarcasm being in good
>measure? Your last two line didn't have it. That was
>just rude and inflammatory. You have no right talking
>to Satsuki-chan like that.
Nor does she have any right to talk to Marina like that. But there's that hypocrisy thing again- you and your friends can post whatever they like and you don't see how it could offend anyone. God forbid anyone else say anything like that though.
>I'm tired of this as you are and it's obviously
>neither of us are going to resolve anything, so if you
>could refrain from saying anything catty about my
>friends, I'll give you the last word.
Cool. The last word. I'd recommend it, actually- it'd be hard for the two of you to look any worse than you already do, but I have no doubt you could accomplish it in time.
I only respond in kind, darling.
-Ari
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 