Re: Joint environment -- EDPR 7/8112 Adolescence Sec. 001 0500-0800 R

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:55:52 02/07/07 Wed
Author: Beth Hansen
Subject: Re: Joint environment
In reply to: Ethel S. McKinney 's message, "Joint environment" on 17:37:58 02/04/07 Sun

It is important when planning peer collaborative work to put a lot of thought into the grouping of students. You mentioned creating groups with at least one knowledgable member each. It seems it would be most beneficial to put into effect Vygotsky's theory of the zone of proximal development when grouping students. Don't just divide up the smartest students and split them into different groups. It may be better to group the students with others near their ability level, where those slightly above the others in the group can act as the upper limit of the zone. Then, students would be helping those just slightly below their level. This may be more beneficial for both those students considered on the upper and lower limit of the zone.

I agree with Vygotsky's collaborative learning
>environment, but being a teacher, I must make sure the
>team has at least one knowledgable member.Modeling the
>behavior of their peers is what adolescents do and
>teacher administators feel this should be actively
>modeled in the classroom. In a perfect world it would
>work without a hitch, but in practicum, I know that if
>I have not set ground rule several days before,
>prepped the classroom, gathered the materials, and
>shown the students a sample of what is expected, they
>will not be able to work together without causing
>chaos. Middle school and high school classrooms are
>allowed to have up to and no more than 35 students.
>Peer collaborative activities, while beneficial
>according to Vygotsky, are a nightmare for the
>teacher. Knowing this will help most of my students
>learn better, I still only have group activities once
>a month because of the extensive planning. Personally
>I think its fabulous to utilize in a smaller group
>environment.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Re: Joint environment -- Evelyn Moore, 22:00:17 02/07/07 Wed

I AGREE with TEAM. I have found that there is no other advantage than TEAM. Together Everyone Achieves More; TEAMWORK Mzkes the Dream Work; People create most what they help to create... You could say that these sayings are my core values. They work whether in corporate america, educational arena, at church, in your community or in your family.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]