susie rugg -- Suave's Celebrity Artwork

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Heh d:-D -- Alpha_Wolf, 13:10:25 11/07/02 Thu

Just thought i'd see what you would say suave. It's your site, So you get to post the controversial answers. LOL. d:-D That was One of my reasons tho. This site is for "Celebrity Artwork" and Susie aint exactly the Mona Lisa of actresses. Plus ive noticed shes never really had any decent storylines and has always been sort of an "inbetween" or odd character.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> SOB! -- Alpha_Wolf, 13:13:49 11/07/02 Thu

replyed to the wrong msg. Must have had a lapse of concentration. d:-|

[ Edit | View ]

[> Brodie -- Suave, 12:28:42 11/07/02 Thu

Hehehe, thanks Alpha Wolf :) Hmmm, how can I say this without offending anyone? This site is not for good actresses; it is for good-looking actresses. Susie is not good-looking. Thankfully she is leaving the Bay soon.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Brodie -- Tiff, 11:07:59 11/08/02 Fri

Glad we got that sorted out, you superficial chauvenist

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Sif ! -- Alpha_Wolf, 15:16:39 11/08/02 Fri

Would an art gallery allow poor quality art in it's halls tiff?? This is an "artwork" site so it's the same thing.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Sif ! -- Me, 23:02:01 11/09/02 Sat

Of course, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think she's very cute and appealing in an innocent way, myself, not exactly beautiful though.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Sif ! (whatever that means) -- Tiff, 14:28:17 11/10/02 Sun

Every human being is a beautiful creation, a piece of artwork from God... anybody who can not recognise this is a bigot

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: Sif ! (whatever that means) -- Alpha_Wolf, 17:54:36 11/10/02 Sun

Sif is a widely used shortened version of "as if" . Oh no, please don't start preaching religion here.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Brodie -- Me, 17:31:19 11/10/02 Sun

Do you think Hitler was a beautiful creation, a piece of artwork from God? And by the way, why do you call beautiful pieces of artwiork from god, bigots?

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Told Tiff. -- Alpha_Wolf, 17:59:39 11/10/02 Sun

you just got OWNED by that statement tiff. LOL.

Another example: terrorists. Hardly a "beautiful creation" from god.

[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: susie rugg -- Me, 14:24:45 11/12/02 Tue

Tif, in all seriousness - what is wrong with liking the way another human looks? Sure looks are only a small part of what a person is, and the way I see it not very important to most non-shallow people. I liken it to admiring a persons singing voice, or musical ability. I like Thom Yorke's (from Radiohead) voice, so I listen to him, I like Britney Spears body, so I watch her. I know very little else about either of them, and I can't(and try not to) make a judgement on them as overall people, but I do like those little parts of them. Whats wrong with that?

[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: susie rugg -- lt paris, 10:11:22 12/15/02 Sun

for me, susie is better looking than tammin and christie