Re: ALAN KEYES FOR US PRESIDENT IN 2004! Your opinion please! -- Politicsvt

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:03:02 03/25/03 Tue
Author: Lisa
Subject: Re: ALAN KEYES FOR US PRESIDENT IN 2004! Your opinion please!
In reply to: James 's message, "Re: ALAN KEYES FOR US PRESIDENT IN 2004! Your opinion please!" on 10:30:03 03/25/03 Tue

James,

You are a blowhard.

Take a close look at this message board.

There are very few message chains that you haven't had to have the last word on. I don't attribute this to the fact that you are a Republican or that we disagree on issues.

I attribute it to the fact that you are a blowhard.

>It is sad that I can't disagree with your opinions
>without being arrogant or a know it all. Just as you
>have opinions, I do as well. I don't believe that I
>know a lot let alone everything but wouldn't mind if I
>did. I know that liberals often times don't let facts
>get in the way of a good argument and are so blindly
>partisan that everything in life is the republicans
>fault. I am sorry that my understanding that the vast
>majority of the issues that we face today are
>bipartisan and long running offends you.
>
>I know that you and your kind wouls like it if no one
>ever voiced an opinion that differs from yours but the
>1st amanedment covers us as well. Suprise
>
>
>
>>James,
>>
>>It must be difficult being so incredibly smart. Is
>>there anything you don't have an opinion about or are
>>an expert in? Your arrogance and self righteous
>>attitude continue to amaze me.
>>
>>What a blowhard!
>>
>>
>>
>>>James is not paranoid and doesn't believe in
>>>conspiracies for the most part. I was pointing out a
>>>flawed belief that has been instilled in many through
>>>divisive propoganda.
>>>
>>>Bush's judges are only right wingers if you are on
>the
>>>far left of the spectrum. There have been a number of
>>>appointees that were actually nominated first by
>>>Clinton and many others are moderate to right of
>>>moderate.
>>>
>>>A smart politician would move to the center if
>>>attacked on the flanks by a candidate on the far
>>>reaches left or right. Bradley actually moved from
>his
>>>moderate views to deeply liberal and thus made Gore
>>>look more moderate than he was.
>>>
>>>Drilling in alaska is not some right wing idea. There
>>>are people of all stripes that support it because we
>>>know the facts and there are people of all stripes
>>>that oppose it because of some emotional cut off that
>>>doesn't allow them to see the reality of the
>situation
>>>in ANWR. the alaskan contingent supports drilling
>they
>>>know that it is not only safe but has great benenfits
>>>to what wildlife is there as was the original
>>>pipeline. The north slope is not a pristine piece of
>>>land as some like to say, sorry but it isn't.
>>>
>>>
>>>As far as a womans right to choose, except for in
>>>cases of rape, the woman has the right to choose,it
>is
>>>a word called NO. I am not an extremist on the issue
>>>as I feel that incase of rape, serious medical issues
>>>with the mother or child and such call for a decision
>>>on the womans, mans, and doctors part as to which of
>>>the painful choices is best for all involved. That
>>>puts me at odds with many pro lifers. When talking
>>>about abortion you are talking about taking the life
>>>of an innocent and defensless child, that is not
>just
>>>a "choice". deciding whether to go to Burger King or
>>>McDonalds is a "choice".
>>>
>>>Deficit spending is a reality in the situation we are
>>>in. I am sure you are not open to thi but the big
>boom
>>>of the nineties has been proven to be nothing more
>>>than a big ponzi scheme. The dot coms went bust
>>>letting everyone know that they had been investing in
>>>little more than junk bonds for lack of a better
>>>description. Corporation after corporation has come
>>>out admitting to cooking the books for the past5-7
>>>years telling us further that the economy we thought
>>>we had was nothing more than smoke and mirrors. Tax
>>>cuts have been proven time and again to increase
>>>revenue ( was done by republican and democrat
>>>presidents)not lower them. The stock market is influx
>>>due to a lot of uncertainty and the aformentioned
>>>reality of the fake boom and its demise.
>>>
>>>America is in a lot of trouble financially and it is
>>>not due to Bush, Congress or even Clinton (the fraud
>>>was occuring while he was in office but the president
>>>has very little to do with this). Just like you and
>I,
>>>when we have emergencies that wipe us out, sometimes
>>>we have to borrow more and get into more debt before
>>>we climb back out the other side.
>>>
>>>Besides, congress decides and passes the budget
>>>regardless of what a president recommends. In the
>80's
>>>the congress spent 2 dollars for ever dollar in new
>>>revenue that the tax cuts brought in. The deficit was
>>>congresses not reagans. (well an honest person would
>>>say it was a team effort) Today, the congress and
>>>their pork barrel spending has every bit to do with
>>>deficit spending democrat and republican. Sorry it
>>>isn't a partisan issue
>>>
>>>
>>>>Relax Jim. The point I was making was that a
>>>>conservative challenge in the GOP primary would
>force
>>>>Bush to move right. (Just like Al Gore moved left
>in
>>>>response to Bill Bradley's primary challenge).
>>>>
>>>>There's not always a conspiracy against Republicans
>>>>going on. Why are you so paranoid?
>>>>
>>>>And I do disagree that Bush has been moderate. I
>>will
>>>>admit it depends on your perspective. Robert Baral
>>>>would call himn a liberal so he's supporting Alan
>>>>Keyes. I think his judicial appointments have been
>>>>right wing idealogues, he's still pursuing drilling
>>in
>>>>Alaska, he's whittling away at a women's right to
>>>>choose, and his committment to deficit spending is
>>>>pathetic.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>It is sad to hear that you are so brainwashed that
>>>you
>>>>>believe that republicans wouldnt vote for a black
>>>>>person. You better take a good look at the way the
>>>>>dems treat their minority candidates and voters
>>>before
>>>>>spewing such ignorance. We'd never vote for a race
>>>>>baiting extortionist like Jesse jackson but I bet
>if
>>>>>Clarence thomas or someone with similiar moral
>>values
>>>>>and integrity ran he'd have a good chance.
>>>>>
>>>>>A note to Lisa, domestically Bush has been pretty
>>>>>moderate. He has worked with some of the most
>>liberal
>>>>>senators and congressman in Washington including
>>>Teddy
>>>>>Kennedy whom he let destroy the NCLB act.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Keyes can't win because the Republicans will never
>>>be
>>>>>>able to vote a black man for president and the
>>>>>>Democrats will never vote a right-wing maniac for
>>>>>>president.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Remember when Keyes came to Vermont? He got a
>very
>>>>>>cold reception.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I would like to see Alan Keyes be the Republican
>>>>>Party
>>>>>>>candidate for US President in 2004.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I would like to see Alan Keyes win the US
>>>>>Presidential
>>>>>>>elections in 2004.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Here is his current website "Renew America"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.renewamerica.us/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What do you folks say about this?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: ALAN KEYES FOR US PRESIDENT IN 2004! Your opinion please! -- James, 05:28:58 03/26/03 Wed