Re: ride a bike -- Politicsvt

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:36:39 03/28/03 Fri
Author: James
Subject: Re: ride a bike
In reply to: Bulldogscm 's message, "ride a bike" on 08:51:37 03/28/03 Fri

Riding a bike or walking is a good idea. Drilling for oil is not now nor has it ever been solely a conservative republican agenda so stop labelling it as such. As far as the "endangered animals go, the proof is there that what animals are there will not be adversly affected.
The problem with the radical environmentalists (I'm not saying you are one) is that they use the "endangered" animals and the "environment" as tools to stop everything and anything they oppose even when it is proven that they are incorrect in their assertions.

>Hey, I am more concerned about perserving those
>endangered species in that refuge, then a stupid car.
>Ride a bike to work, that's what I am doing.
>
>Oil prices are high, we all agree with that. But, what
>would YOU rather have: a clean, perserved refuge for
>endangered wildlife, or a polluted refuge because your
>gas prices were too high. Think about it, sacrificing
>that refuge and wildlife so you can have lower gas
>prices is unacceptable. That is what I would say to
>Lisa Murkowski and Ted Stevens (Senators from Alaska).
>
>But you know, Senator Murkowski does state that it
>will bring a bigger labor force to Alaska. That's
>great, but I would rather protect the environment (in
>this case) then drill for oil because of a
>conservative GOP platform.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]