VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:43:52 12/03/02 Tue
Author: More about guns;perhaps we can find some common ground?
Subject: Jane Hamilton

So should a person who is convicted of murder, served time and been released also have the right to bear arms? How about the convicted wife beater? The convicted rapist? How about someone with severe mental illness who is prone to violence?

A nuclear missile is an arm. If the right to bear arms is not to be infringed, anyone should be able to own a nuke ... or a tank ... or a grenade ... or napalm ... or an AK47, M16 ...

My point is that there needs to be a balance. I'll bet that there is some common ground among us on this issue.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.