Re: Re - Port pollution -- Fan Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Re: Re - Port pollution

Author:
Rick

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03:24:58 03/22/04 Mon
In reply to: observer 's message, "Re: Re - Port pollution" on 13:28:49 03/21/04 Sun

Partly right Observer. Players are only sent back to their "junior" club from Steelers if they still qualify for Under 18's or below. Once the player leaves Under 18's, it is up to them as to which club they go/return to. In this case, as Lulia has already signed with Port and is no longer eligible for 18's, he would return to Port if not needed by Steelers. At the start of last year, Jordan signed with Port but then opted to return to Wests as Port had in the meantime signed David Hall to play first Grade. Port released Jordan to play with Wests, even though they would have been well within their right to refuse the release. In the end, both Wests and Port took into consideration the best outcome for both players and clubs.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]