Re: Bless you all -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14/05/10 5:56:10pm
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: Re: Bless you all
In reply to: Peter Eveleigh 's message, "Re: Bless you all" on 14/05/10 5:45:19pm

I think Mick Temperate would have agreed with you, Anon. When I visited the fellowship just a few years ago, he listed lots of consequences of my activities....including lots of people wavering in their commitment, others leaving, the church being unable to book venues, etc...and I regard all that as good stuff.

http://ja-1984.blogspot.com/2007/10/shaking-noels-hand.html

Blowing the whistle on the fellowship really was a disaster for the church and I am proud of that fact because its style of shepherding and the arrogance of its leadership was a disaster for so many people. If the fellowship is now more open, as it claims and if it now regrets its "mistakes" and wants to be thought to be a different type of church from its past, I am delighted to have been responsible in some way for that revolution.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

All Boys Together! -- Barbara, 25/05/10 11:20:07am
- Re: All Boys Together! -- Peter Eveleigh, 25/05/10 6:14:41pm
  - Re: All Boys Together! -- Barbara, 25/05/10 8:26:23pm
    - Re: All Boys Together! -- Anon (Bored now), 25/05/10 8:31:33pm
    - Re: All Boys Together! -- Peter Eveleigh, 25/05/10 10:10:38pm
      - Evidence -- Barbara, 26/05/10 8:27:48am
MICK -- Barbara, 25/05/10 11:32:36am
- Senator Stuart Syvret -- Barbara, 25/05/10 11:41:38am
  - relevance? -- Peter Eveleigh, 25/05/10 6:17:09pm
- you still here, Barbara (so much for your resolve) -- Peter Eveleigh, 25/05/10 6:16:24pm
  - Yes I am still here -- Barbara, 25/05/10 8:29:44pm
    - Re: Yes I am still here -- Anon, 25/05/10 8:34:31pm
      - Peter -- Barbara, 25/05/10 8:42:19pm
        Re: Peter -- Anon, 25/05/10 9:11:34pm
        Re: Peter -- Barbara, 25/05/10 9:14:03pm
        Re: Peter -- Anon, 25/05/10 9:37:42pm
        Re: Peter -- Peter Eveleigh, 25/05/10 10:13:56pm
        The Bully, the Liar and the Unholy Scoundrel -- Barbara, 26/05/10 8:35:25am

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>I think Mick Temperate would have agreed with you, >Anon. When I visited the fellowship just a few years >ago, he listed lots of consequences of my >activities....including lots of people wavering in >their commitment, others leaving, the church being >unable to book venues, etc...and I regard all that as >good stuff. > ><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >href="http://ja-1984.blogspot.com/2007/10/shaking-noels >-hand.html">http://ja-1984.blogspot.com/2007/10/shaking >-noels-hand.html</a> > >Blowing the whistle on the fellowship really was a >disaster for the church and I am proud of that fact >because its style of shepherding and the arrogance of >its leadership was a disaster for so many people. If >the fellowship is now more open, as it claims and if >it now regrets its "mistakes" and wants to be thought >to be a different type of church from its past, I am >delighted to have been responsible in some way for >that revolution.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.