Re: has anyone actually read that posting all the way through? -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 25/05/10 7:17:33pm
Author: Anon
Subject: Re: has anyone actually read that posting all the way through?
In reply to: Peter Eveleigh 's message, "has anyone actually read that posting all the way through?" on 25/05/10 6:12:45pm

I have looked on the site and read the whole thing also checked out the articles etc it has no relevance to me the illuminati theory is my favourite. I fail to see what discussing it on here will solve.

If this site was called ex JA's then it would at least be a bit more relevant as that would suggest an anything goes forum.

I realise this seems to be an anything goes forum but it does seem that the majority of postings are tainted with a common purpose thread or a secret family courts thread.

I would like to discuss the JA and have some discussions with everyone rather than slagging people off or being slagged off just because I have a disagreement with someone.
>>Again I fail to see exactly what this has to do with
>>the JA and I'm not really bothered about conspiracy
>>theories.
>
>
>That is exactly what I have said all along. It just is
>not relevant on this site. I don't really get why
>saying that makes me a bully.
>
>ho hum

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

let's talk then -- Peter Eveleigh, 25/05/10 7:28:32pm
- Re: let's talk then -- Anon, 25/05/10 8:37:09pm
  - It won't be a very interesting conversation -- Barbara, 25/05/10 8:45:17pm
    - Re: It won't be a very interesting conversation -- Anon, 25/05/10 9:17:50pm
      - Funny -- Barbara, 25/05/10 9:34:36pm
        Re: Funny -- Anon, 25/05/10 9:43:27pm
        Do as you like -- Barbara, 25/05/10 9:55:43pm
        Re: Do as you like -- Peter Eveleigh, 25/05/10 10:05:34pm
        Re: Do as you like -- Anon, 25/05/10 10:17:37pm
  - you start a thread -- Peter Eveleigh, 25/05/10 11:17:55pm
    - To all the Peters - a helpful suggestion -- Barbara, 26/05/10 8:41:35am
      - Correct me if I'm wrong here, but..... -- the artist formerly known as anon., 26/05/10 11:26:48am
        Hello again PETER -- Barbara, 26/05/10 12:25:19pm
        Re: Hello again BABS -- the artist formerly known as anon., 26/05/10 12:33:04pm
        PETER -- Barbara, 26/05/10 12:38:09pm
        Re: Babs -- the artist formerly known as anon., 26/05/10 12:42:28pm
        Taunts of "Nut Job" -- Barbara, 26/05/10 2:27:46pm
        Re: Taunts of "Nut Job" -- the artist formerly known as anon., 26/05/10 2:56:55pm
        Re: Taunts of "Nut Job" -- Anon, 26/05/10 4:25:16pm
        Re: Taunts of "Nut Job" -- the artist formerly known as anon., 26/05/10 4:45:59pm
        Ancient ancestral relic -- Barbara, 26/05/10 5:20:18pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>I have looked on the site and read the whole thing >also checked out the articles etc it has no relevance >to me the illuminati theory is my favourite. I fail to >see what discussing it on here will solve. > >If this site was called ex JA's then it would at least >be a bit more relevant as that would suggest an >anything goes forum. > >I realise this seems to be an anything goes forum but >it does seem that the majority of postings are tainted >with a common purpose thread or a secret family courts >thread. > >I would like to discuss the JA and have some >discussions with everyone rather than slagging people >off or being slagged off just because I have a >disagreement with someone. >>>Again I fail to see exactly what this has to do with >>>the JA and I'm not really bothered about conspiracy >>>theories. >> >> >>That is exactly what I have said all along. It just is >>not relevant on this site. I don't really get why >>saying that makes me a bully. >> >>ho hum
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.