VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:27:58 12/29/02 Sun
Author: 黑仔
Subject: 回應「誰是英雄」一點
In reply to: 黑仔 's message, "回應「真真假假，有誰知道？」一點" on 08:59:58 12/29/02 Sun

再回應「誰是英雄」一點：
據前文分析，這電影並無「真真假假，有誰知道？」的效果，則所謂「英雄又是不是真的存在呢？」這質疑似乎並無理據。從電影的處理看來，「英雄」大抵可包括秦王、無名及殘劍。

前文提到，這電影有凌駕於二人敘說的敘述層，片末的字幕其實正是其中之一。片末的字幕說秦王「築長城，護國護民，成為中國歷史上第一位皇帝。」「築長城」尚算是客觀描述，「護國護民」則已涉及價值判斷了。一來這些字幕屬於外敘述，是電影中最權威的聲音，二來這些字幕置於片末，更有最後判斷的意味。這是《英雄》視秦王為「英雄」的證明。

殘劍放棄刺殺秦王，又以「天下」二字說服無名不刺秦王，促成秦王日後的「護國護民」；無名也願意犧牲自己，放棄刺秦，同樣促成秦王日後的「護國護民」。因此，二人在電影中都算是「英雄」。

上文是對電影中所呈現的「英雄」觀念的整理，但話說回來，我自己是絕不同意這種價值觀的。Mark轉貼的英雄奇文，大抵說出了《英雄》「天下」、「英雄」觀的荒謬，未必算是誤讀。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.