VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:53:37 10/18/02 Fri
Author: 君臨
Subject: Re: 通篇謬論... 未必
In reply to: 方綺 's message, "通篇謬論... [又一章套上同一套理論炒冷飯]" on 11:50:39 10/18/02 Fri

>1. 君臨否定鍾是詩人的理據是[詩人必須一生寫詩 不離不棄]
>相信創作人繼續從事創作與否不直接影響別人對他作品的評價
>文字不同說話的時間性限制
>說了一句話要再跟另一個人溝通要在說一遍
>寫了下來的文字卻可以繼續流傳
>文學作品的評價才是代表一個創作人的成就 是否受到肯定
>舉個例子: 金庸不再寫武俠小說難道他不是一名作家???
【如果金庸真的不寫，只能稱他曾經是作家，現在已退休。好清楚。】
>2. 假設[詩是詩人的語言]是對的
>那麼不說話的人表示他們不會說話嗎?
>沉默少言的人可能反而是更會說話的人,
>因為他們話不多所以以說話前會先思考組織一下
>作出更精準的發言
>因為說得多悶而不說的人多得是 反反復復勞氣地說話
>都無人睬就會識得收聲 一直鬧人都會嘴酸 費事再講
>這就是假設下[詩的語言]的道理 .
【從此不再寫詩，與沉默少言不能相喻,先搞清楚。】
>
>3. 把詩與禪宗相提並論無不可, 但是[寫詩如悟道],
>[詩人如得道高僧]的理論屬於主觀聯想的意見
>是君臨對兩者一致推崇下的產生的[妙喻]
>當中[悟道的標準]相信只有君臨自己明白
>又或者說 每個人[悟道的標準]都不同
>悟前悟後的分別就是寫詩的風格不一樣了
>別人的評價高了或者自認為寫得更好了
>於是人人喜歡說: [我終於悟了!]

【不錯，任何人的悟道，只有他自己知道其中玄機。】

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.